Short-Medium term market prospects for cereals (Section II)
Andree Defois, Editor in Chief, Strategie Grains, France
What is the perspective for the end of the current crop year?
The mechanisms for eliminating the grain deficit in the EU are now in place and therefore cereal prices should no longer be subject to a new additional bullish pressure. In the short term, wheat and maize prices could actually ease. Nevertheless, the situation is extremely precarious: the European internal market must continue to draw in maize and wheat from third countries and rye from intervention. This will keep any large potential decrease pressure in check. The precarious situation on the European market is heightened by the fact that the world wheat and maize balances are also exceptionally tight. Any increase in the price of imported wheat (i.e. through an increase in dollar prices or an appreciation of the dollar against the euro) would automatically reduce the volume of imports to the EU. In the case of maize, any increase in the world price would be partially compensated for by a reduction in the rate of import duty on entry to the EU (assuming the increase did not exceed the actual rate of duty). Any factor which delayed the arrival of third country maize into the EU – such as a reduction in Brazilian maize availability or a worsening of the current scarcity of transatlantic shipping – would immediately cause the EU maize balance to tighten again. The uncertainty surrounding weather conditions over the next six months is another contributor to the precarious atmosphere: the level of stock we forecast at the end of the crop year in the EU will be adequate only if the 2004 harvest registers a significant increase on the 2003 harvest.
Malting barley is the only grain which is not concerned by the tight situation. The EU malting
barley production has increased by 1 Mt from the 2002/03 level, following yield improvement in the northern part of the EU and a switch from winter to spring areas because of the very harsh climate conditions during the winter. In the meantime, Canadian and Australian crops have recovered to normal levels after large reductions in 2002/03. Also, while still on a long term increasing trend, world malting barley demand has been quite sluggish recently because of high freight rates, a reduction in beer sales in Brazil and Japan and a downturn in South American economies. In the EU, malting barley usage has been reduced in Germany following the new rules about beer cans.
Malting barley prices have thus come down from last year’s level in a first stage. Then they recovered slightly because the very low premiums on feed barley prices led to the usage of malting barley in animal feeds.
The surge in feed barley prices has thus pushed up malting barley prices. Any further increase potential seems limited now, however, because European barley is expensive compared to competitor origins on the world market. Also, despite the fact that EU malting barley export availability has been reduced to the benefit of animal feeds, it remains sufficient to meet export demand for malting barley addressed to the EU (currently estimated at between 1 to 1.3 Mt).
… and for 2004/05?
Bullish factors
- The US winter wheat area for the 2004 harvest is estimated down by 3%. US yields were high in 2003 thanks to very good spring weather conditions: a return to the trend means a possible reduction for the 2004 wheat yield.
- Chinese grain stocks are currently being reduced by a large extent and next year’s crop prospect is not fantastic.
- The world wheat and coarse grain carry-in stock will be at historical lows: it is currently estimated at 230 Mt, the lowest level over the last 30 years, both in terms of tonnage and in terms of ratio to annual consumption (15%).
- World feed use of grains has increased by 4 Mt only in 2003/04, against an annual average increase of 6 to 7 Mt over the last 5 years. There is now a need to recover.
- Possibility of a dollar appreciation against the euro.
| Area | --Imports-- | --Exports-- | Domestic | Domestic | Ending | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| harvested | Yield | Production | feed use | total use | stocks | |||
| WHEAT | ||||||||
| 1992/93 | 30.5 | 3.3 | 101.6 | 6.7 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 104.3 | 60.2 |
| 1993/94 | 30.2 | 3.5 | 106.4 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 105.3 | 65.0 |
| 1994/95 | 29.0 | 3.4 | 99.3 | 10.3 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 105.4 | 68.7 |
| 1995/96 | 28.9 | 3.5 | 102.2 | 12.5 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 106.5 | 76.5 |
| 1996/97 | 29.6 | 3.7 | 110.6 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 107.6 | 81.2 |
| 1997/98 | 30.1 | 4.1 | 123.3 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 4.9 | 109.1 | 96.2 |
| 1998/99 | 29.8 | 3.7 | 109.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 108.3 | 97.9 |
| 1999/00 | 28.9 | 3.9 | 113.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 109.3 | 102.9 |
| 2000/01 | 26.7 | 3.7 | 99.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 10.0 | 110.3 | 91.9 |
| 2001/02 | 24.7 | 3.8 | 93.9 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 9.0 | 108.7 | 76.6 |
| 2002/03 | 23.9 | 3.8 | 90.3 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 6.5 | 105.2 | 60.4 |
| 2003/04 | 22.3 | 3.9 | 87.0 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 6.0 | 104.5 | 43.2 |
| COARSE GRAINS | ||||||||
| 1992/93 | 26.3 | 4.2 | 109.3 | 0.6 | 13.0 | 64.4 | 102.6 | 85.4 |
| 1993/94 | 25.8 | 4.5 | 117.2 | 1.3 | 12.0 | 70.2 | 109.3 | 82.5 |
| 1994/95 | 26.1 | 4.4 | 114.3 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 79.6 | 118.0 | 83.6 |
| 1995/96 | 27.3 | 4.6 | 124.5 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 82.4 | 120.2 | 90.6 |
| 1996/97 | 29.1 | 4.9 | 141.3 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 86.6 | 126.3 | 103.8 |
| 1997/98 | 28.1 | 4.1 | 114.7 | 1.6 | 6.2 | 90.7 | 125.1 | 88.8 |
| 1998/99 | 29.1 | 4.9 | 143.5 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 91.9 | 128.9 | 102.6 |
| 1999/00 | 29.6 | 4.6 | 137.2 | 2.3 | 10.0 | 93.2 | 129.5 | 102.7 |
| 2000/01 | 26.5 | 4.3 | 114.0 | 2.4 | 7.3 | 93.4 | 130.1 | 81.7 |
| 2001/02 | 27.5 | 4.4 | 122.3 | 2.0 | 8.6 | 94.2 | 133.1 | 64.2 |
| 2002/03 | 27.7 | 4.7 | 129.2 | 1.8 | 15.3 | 95.0 | 136.3 | 43.6 |
| 2003/04 | 26.7 | 4.5 | 121.3 | 2.1 | 8.0 | 96.0 | 138.6 | 20.3 |
Source: USDA

Fig. 3: World wheat stocks (as a % of demand) and prices
Source: Tallage / USDA
| Area | World | Feed | Total | Ending | Stocks as | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| harvested | Yield | Production | trade | use | use | stocks | % of cons. | |
| 1975/76 | 564.7 | 1.76 | 993.7 | 139.2 | 457.1 | 984.3 | 179.5 | 18.2 |
| 1976/77 | 575.1 | 1.92 | 1106.4 | 142.9 | 489.4 | 1044.8 | 241.1 | 23.1 |
| 1977/78 | 570.7 | 1.87 | 1068.9 | 158.3 | 511.7 | 1076.8 | 233.2 | 21.7 |
| 1978/79 | 569.7 | 2.08 | 1183.1 | 161.8 | 556.8 | 1138.1 | 278.2 | 24.4 |
| 1979/80 | 569.0 | 2.03 | 1153.1 | 182.6 | 573.9 | 1157.6 | 273.7 | 23.6 |
| 1980/81 | 577.7 | 2.01 | 1159.5 | 200.6 | 562.6 | 1179.3 | 255.2 | 21.6 |
| 1981/82 | 588.0 | 2.05 | 1204.2 | 196.9 | 573.5 | 1178.4 | 281.0 | 23.8 |
| 1982/83 | 577.1 | 2.16 | 1248.3 | 189.6 | 593.4 | 1197.3 | 332.1 | 27.7 |
| 1983/84 | 563.9 | 2.06 | 1162.5 | 193.2 | 588.3 | 1216.2 | 278.5 | 22.9 |
| 1984/85 | 567.1 | 2.32 | 1315.3 | 203.6 | 609.9 | 1253.9 | 339.9 | 27.1 |
| 1985/86 | 571.1 | 2.33 | 1328.7 | 165.2 | 613.1 | 1248.0 | 420.5 | 33.7 |
| 1986/87 | 565.9 | 2.38 | 1348.8 | 174.7 | 644.2 | 1300.4 | 468.9 | 36.1 |
| 1987/88 | 545.1 | 2.35 | 1283.2 | 202.2 | 655.2 | 1329.8 | 420.1 | 31.6 |
| 1988/89 | 542.3 | 2.25 | 1218.0 | 203.3 | 618.2 | 1301.6 | 336.5 | 25.9 |
| 1989/90 | 548.4 | 2.42 | 1327.0 | 208.9 | 643.0 | 1345.9 | 317.5 | 23.6 |
| 1990/91 | 548.7 | 2.58 | 1417.1 | 190.1 | 666.8 | 1368.8 | 365.8 | 26.7 |
| 1991/92 | 545.3 | 2.48 | 1353.7 | 207.5 | 649.8 | 1363.3 | 356.2 | 26.1 |
| 1992/93 | 549.4 | 2.61 | 1433.4 | 206.3 | 662.0 | 1392.1 | 394.7 | 28.4 |
| 1993/94 | 540.4 | 2.51 | 1356.7 | 188.3 | 654.1 | 1390.8 | 360.6 | 25.9 |
| 1994/95 | 537.9 | 2.59 | 1392.8 | 200.1 | 669.8 | 1400.5 | 353.0 | 25.2 |
| 1995/96 | 532.8 | 2.51 | 1339.3 | 187.4 | 640.2 | 1385.3 | 307.0 | 22.2 |
| 1996/97 | 553.0 | 2.70 | 1490.9 | 198.3 | 673.2 | 1447.5 | 350.4 | 24.2 |
| 1997/98 | 539.4 | 2.77 | 1492.8 | 190.1 | 684.5 | 1450.2 | 393.1 | 27.1 |
| 1998/99 | 533.1 | 2.78 | 1481.1 | 198.7 | 678.6 | 1450.0 | 424.2 | 29.3 |
| 1999/00 | 515.2 | 2.84 | 1462.8 | 217.5 | 684.8 | 1468.3 | 418.7 | 28.5 |
| 2000/01 | 514.7 | 2.80 | 1441.4 | 208.1 | 690.8 | 1465.7 | 394.4 | 26.9 |
| 2001/02 | 515.3 | 2.86 | 1474.3 | 212.5 | 705.6 | 1491.3 | 377.4 | 25.3 |
| 2002/03 | 506.9 | 2.84 | 1438.7 | 212.5 | 704.7 | 1506.1 | 310.0 | 20.6 |
| 2003/04 | 510.1 | 2.81 | 1435.9 | 201.8 | 709.1 | 1518.1 | 227.7 | 15.0 |
Source: USDA
Bearish factors
- Weather permitting, grain production in the EU 25 is expected to recover by a large amount. On the basis of our preliminary assessment, the grain acreage could increase by more than 1 Mha in the EU 15 and by 1.9 Mha in the EU 25. On the basis of trend yields, grain production in the EU could recover by more than 30 Mt in the EU 15, and by 40 Mt in the EU 25.
- Grain production is set to recover also in the FSU because current weather conditions are better than a year ago.
| Cereals | Area (kha) |
% Change |
Yield (t/ha) |
% Change |
Production (Mt) |
% Change |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/2 | 02/3 | 03/4 | 04/5 | 03/4 | 01/2 | 02/3 | 03/4 | 04/5 | 03/4 | 01/2 | 02/3 | 03/4 | 04/5 | 03/4 | |||
| Soft wheat | EU 15 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 13.4 | 14.0 | 5% | 6.4 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 7.0 | 13% | 83.3 | 93.8 | 82.4 | 97.6 | 18% | |
| EU 25 | 18.8 | 19.4 | 18.4 | 19.5 | 6% | 5.6 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 13% | 105.9 | 114.5 | 98.5 | 118.0 | 20% | ||
| Barley | EU 15 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 2% | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 6% | 48.0 | 47.6 | 46.6 | 50.4 | 8% | |
| EU 25 | 13.5 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 1% | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 7% | 56.7 | 56.1 | 54.7 | 58.8 | 8% | ||
| Maize | EU 15 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 7% | 8.8 | 9.0 | 7.2 | 9.1 | 27% | 40.0 | 40.1 | 31.0 | 42.0 | 36% | |
| EU 25 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 5% | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.4 | 8.1 | 28% | 50.5 | 49.9 | 38.9 | 52.4 | 35% | ||
| Durum | EU 15 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3% | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 12% | 6.9 | 8.9 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 16% | |
| EU 25 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3% | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 12% | 6.9 | 8.9 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 16% | ||
| Rye | EU 15 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | -3% | 5.1 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 21% | 6.3 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 18% | |
| EU 25 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 4% | 3.4 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 13% | 11.9 | 9.2 | 6.9 | 8.2 | 19% | ||
| Other cereals | EU 15 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1% | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 6% | 12.9 | 13.9 | 12.6 | 13.6 | 8% | |
| EU 25 | 7.5 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 7.0 | 2% | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 7% | 25.1 | 23.8 | 21.4 | 23.2 | 9% | ||
| Total cereals | EU 15 | 36.3 | 37.2 | 36.1 | 37.4 | 4% | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 14% | 197.3 | 209.1 | 183.9 | 216.7 | 18% | |
| EU 25 | 53.2 | 52.6 | 51.1 | 52.9 | 4% | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 14% | 257.0 | 262.4 | 228.4 | 269.8 | 18% | ||
Source: Strategie Grains as of January 2004
Without any big climate problems (like severe winter frosts or severe droughts), the EU grain deficit should disappear next year. Instead, the EU should again be able to export quite large amounts of grains. The EU 15 wheat exportable surplus could increase to slightly more than 10 Mt (against a 2003/04 export forecast of 5.5 Mt). While the EU exportable surplus is going to increase, it is not however predicted to be dramatically high (in other words, even with a recovery of FSU supplies, it should be easy to export 10 Mt of West European wheat onto the world market if the US crop is down). In conclusion, the EU wheat balance sheet will be heavier than in 2003/04 but it is not going to be a depressive balance sheet.
In a first stage, prices could drift lower in order for EU wheat to regain some competitiveness on the world market (currently EU wheat 2003 costs 40 $/t more than US wheat) and because cheaper imports could be available from the FSU. However, the EU may not need to offer large quantities of grain into intervention, so that wheat prices should not need to drop as low as the intervention level. Today, US wheat 2004 is priced at about 160 $/t Fob on December 2004. If the world situation really tightens again, world wheat prices for the 2004 harvest will still increase from this level and this will have a positive effect on EU prices, as will any recovery in the dollar rate against the euro.
As is the case for wheat, the EU barley balance sheet should not be too heavy either, because the forecast output increase is quite close to the reduction in carry-in stocks.
MEDIUM-TERM PROSPECTS: IMPROVEMENT IN WORLD GRAIN TRADE
According to the EU Commission’s summary of the main medium-term outlook forecasts made by institutes like FAPRI and OECD, a slow but continuous recovery of agricultural markets may be expected. The medium-term prospects for agricultural markets would be mainly driven by an improved macro-economic environment with more broadly based, robust and sustainable growth. Combined with higher population, urbanisation and changes in dietary pattern, particularly in many emerging economies, these prospects for stronger economic growth would support a steady increase in food demand.

Fig. 4: Cumulative population growth 2001-2011 (%)
Source: USDA-FAPRI- EU Commission

Fig. 5: Outlook for GDP growth in % per region (cumulative) 2001-2011
Source: USDA-FAPRI- EU Commission
World trade in agricultural commodities would demonstrate strong growth, as demand for food products would outpace production in many developing countries. Despite a big production increase potential in some regions (like the FSU and Eastern Europe), the tightening of the stock-to-use ratio would in turn sustain commodity prices over the medium term.
Most of the growth would come from the non-OECD regions, which would constitute the main driving force behind these relatively favourable perspectives.
| 2001 | 2009 | Change in trade | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDA | FAPRI | USDA | FAPRI | USDA | FAPRI | |||
| Wheat | 106.7 | 85.1 | 128.1 | 108.9 | 21.4 | 23.8 | ||
| Coarse grains | 101.9 | 84.0 | 120.1 | 107.3 | 18.2 | 23.4 | ||
| Maize | 74.2 | 60.8 | 87.0 | 80.3 | 12.8 | 19.5 | ||
| Barley | 16.8 | 15.2 | 20.5 | 18.2 | 3.7 | 2.9 | ||
| Total cereals | 208.6 | 169.1 | 248.2 | 216.2 | 39.6 | 47.1 | ||
USDA figures include intra-FSU trade. FAPRI: net trade
Source: FAPRI- USDA – EU Commission
| 2001 | 2009 | Change in trade | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDA | FAPRI | USDA | FAPRI | USDA | FAPRI | |||
| Total Asia | 15.8 | 22.2 | 25.9 | 36.1 | 10.1 | 13.9 | ||
| China | 1.0 | 0.5 | 8.0 | 5.1 | 7.0 | 4.6 | ||
| Indonesia | 4.2 | - | 5.2 | - | 1.0 | - | ||
| Japan | 5.8 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | ||
| Africa & M. East | 42.9 | 41.2 | 44.7 | 46.9 | 1.8 | 5.7 | ||
| North Africa* | 13.8 | 14.6 | 13.8 | 17.6 | 0.0 | 3.0 | ||
* Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt Source: FAPRI- USDA – EU Commission
| 2001 | 2009 | Change in trade | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDA | FAPRI | USDA | FAPRI | USDA | FAPRI | |||
| Total Asia | 34.6 | 36.2 | 41.2 | 52.0 | 6.6 | 15.8 | ||
| China | 2.8 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 11.4 | 6.1 | 10.9 | ||
| Indonesia | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | ||
| Japan | 19.6 | 19.2 | 19.0 | 19.3 | -0.6 | 0.1 | ||
| Mexico | 10.8 | 11.0 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | ||
| Other Lat. America* | 10.5 | 7.2 | 13.2 | 8.8 | 2.7 | 1.6 | ||
| Africa & M. East | 26.0 | 24.9 | 32.9 | 27.7 | 6.9 | 2.8 | ||
| North Afr.**& M. East | 24.5 | 20.2 | 30.9 | 22.6 | 6.4 | 2.4 | ||
* excluding Argentina
**only Algeria and Egypt in FAPRI Source: FAPRI- USDA - EU Commission
Notwithstanding the relative improvement in the market fundamentals of most agricultural sectors that is projected over the medium term, a prudent interpretation of these favourable perspectives is deemed necessary. These projections remain subject to many uncertainties that can be expected to moderate the positive pattern forecast for future trade and price growth. The most important include the future course of agricultural policy in many regions (notably the US Farm Security and Rural Investment Act), the new round of multilateral trade negotiations, the future macro-economic perspectives and the scope for further productivity growth in some regions. In the EU however, decoupling could limit slightly (but not stop) the increase in grain production and this could contribute to this overall tightening trend.
In the world cereal markets, higher demand would outpace domestic supply in many developing countries, including China, North Africa and Latin America, and trigger a sustained expansion in global cereal trade. Total cereal trade would increase by between 40 and 47 M t by 2009/10, i.e. at a much quicker pace than in the 1980s and 1990s.
Global trade in wheat would strengthen, with annual growth averaging about 2.3% - 3.1%, whereas coarse grain trade would exhibit a similar pattern with an annual average ranging between 2.0% and 3.1% over the 2001/02-2009/10 period.
After having bottomed out at the turn of the century, world prices are projected to display a slow and moderate recovery over the medium term as supply adjusts and global demand strengthens.
The crop years 2002/03 and 2003/04 have provided a good illustration for this price recovery. However, these 2 years have been characterized by severe output reductions in some of the main exporting countries. This may not be repeated every year. So, even if the coming price trend is on the upside compared to the average of the 90s, it does not mean that prices will remain as high as they are now.



