Skip navigation Access keys documentation page Search Agriculture Research Food Research

TEAGASC

NATIONAL ADVISORY PROGRAMMES 2004

Introduction

The preparation of the National Advisory Programme for 2004 is an important step in the process of programme development and evaluation and an essential component in the overall Strategic Management Initiative extended to the public service as part of the Programme for Prosperity and Fairness (PPF).

The Teagasc Statement of Strategy has just been published following a period of consultation. The next step in the process is the development of the National Advisory Programmes for each enterprise/work area. These must contain “impact objectives with a set of quantified targets showing how the current situation is expected to change over time” (Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General).

The National Advisory Programmes have been developed for 2004, but were drawn up in a timeframe of 2000 – 2006 which is the period of the National Development Plan (NDP). In drawing up to individual programmes extensive consultations took place with the relevant Commodity Groups. Clear activity and impact targets have been set together with proposals for monitoring the implementation of the programmes and measuring the impact.

A significant additional component of the 2004 programme is the ‘Planning Post Fischler Programme’. This programme will build on the experiences gained in the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme and is aimed at helping farm families to reposition their farm business in the post decoupling scenario.

The next stage in the process is the up-dating of Business Plans in each county to implement the programmes.

Sincere thanks to all who participated in the Commodity Groups and contributed to the development of the programmes. This National Advisory Programme is an important component of our overall programme development process and this process will be refined over time.

NATIONAL DAIRY ADVISORY PROGRAMME

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

There are 26,622 farmers involved in the production of milk in Ireland (Dept. of Agriculture – April ’02) including around 2000 liquid milk suppliers. Dairying is also a big employer off farm with approx., 9000 employed in related activities.

Table 1 summarises the structure of dairy farming in Ireland in 2002

Table 1 - Number of Producers by Quota Size (Dept. of Agr.)
Quota Size (litres) Number of Producers % of Total Producers
Less than 180,000 14,742 55%
180,000 - 275,000 7,408 28%
275,000 - 455,000 3,401 13%
455,000+ 1,071 4%
Total 26,662 100%

Profitability of Dairying

Over many years dairying has continued to be the most profitable land based enterprise on Irish farms. Average family farm income on dairy farms in 2002 was just under €30,000. This figure derives from an average quota of 188,633 litres corresponding to an average herd size of approximately 43 cows.

Table 2 – Costs of Milk Production ‘99 – ’02
  99 00 01 02 03
Total Variable Cost (c/l) 9.08 8.82 9.11 9.65 9.51*
Total Fixed Cost (c/l) 8.22 8.67 8.77 8.55 8.94*
Common Cost (c/l) 13.81 15.3 15.3*    

Technology Transfer

Discussion groups, monitor farm, farm visits and monthly newsletters will continue to be the key methods of technology transfer. During ’04, numbers in discussion groups will be increased and groups will be used in conjunction with a nation-wide programme of public events to disseminate the latest in technology from Moorepark research. Numbers of monitor farms will be maintained at current numbers and will be used as a means of demonstrating and evaluating research results at local level. These will compliment our discussion groups and facilitate contact with a greater number of clients.

Programme Objectives

Evaluate Client Development Options – Planning Post Fischler Programme

The specific objective is to evaluate development options for our dairy client base in the period to 31st March '05. This will be done through our 'Planning Post Fischler Programme' which will consist of 2-3 group sessions followed by an individual client visit and the completion of a 'Way Forward Action Plan'. The target for '04 will be to put 30% of our clients through this programme.

Improve Dairy Herd Profitability- “Profit Monitor Programme”

The specific objective is to reduce common costs of production by 1.3 c/litre, going from 15.3c/litre in '00 to 14c/litre in '06 and thereby increase dairy farm income by €46million per annum for 15,000 clients. Target common cost for best producers in creamery milk is 11c/litre and 12.5 c/litre for liquid milk. Target annual incremental cost reductions are €7.5 million. Cost reduction will be crucial to viability post Fischler reform.

To achieve this objective in ’04, Teagasc will endeavour to implement detailed financial analysis and planning. Financial management courses will be organised for clients at local office level to improve financial management competence. The Teagasc Cost Control Planner will be covered in financial courses with the objective of getting a quarter of clients to use this programme in the period to ’06.

Improve Milk Protein Content - “Protein 350 Programme”

The specific objective is to increase milk protein percentage from 3.27 in '00 to 3.47 in '06 through annual incremental increases. These annual incremental protein increases are valued at approximately €6 million. This would increase income by €38 million per annum for 15,000 clients by '06.

To improve protein content Teagasc will focus on improvement in grassland management and dairy breeding.

Through discussion groups, seminars, farm walks etc. the optimum grassland management system will be promoted. In the most favourable situations the target will be to have grass in the diet of the cow for 285 days. Establishment of clover on dairy farms with Reps. stocking rates will be promoted. Teagasc will aim to lengthen the grazing season by 40 days for 15000 clients. Grass cover monitoring will be promoted through discussion groups as a method of optimising grass utilisation.

In ’04, Teagasc will implement an information campaign on bull selection and milk recording to help reverse declines in A.I. and milk recording usage.

Programme Targets

Activity Targets
Objectives Programme
Evaluate Client Development Options 'Planning Post Fischler Programme'

Run three group events per advisors

Individual visits to complete 'Way Forward Action Plan'

Discuss options in newsletters

Improve Dairy Herd Profitability “Profit Monitor Programme”

10 clients / advisor to complete Cost Control Planner

Complete 15 Profit Monitors per Advisor

  One financial course (4 sessions) per major office
  Profit/Cost focus at monitor farm open days.
  Undertake an awareness campaign on cost reduction.

Improve Milk Protein Content

'Protein 350 Programme'

2- 3 Discussion groups per advisor focusing on profit & protein

Monitor Farm open days March, June, September

Fertiliser plans for clients

  Information campaign on breeding index and milk recording.
  Promote Dairy Herd Monitor programme to improve practices on farms
  Protein 350 Competition open day April / May
  Winter seminar series
First Quarter – January to March
Evaluate Client Development Options'Planning Post Fischler Programme'

Run three group events for advisors

Individual visits to complete 'Way Forwad Action Plan'

Discuss option in newsletter

Improve Dairy Herd Profitability Complete Profit Monitors for ‘03
  Run financial courses at major offices.
  Newsletter / media articles/farm visits
  Implement Cost Control Planner Programme on 10 clients / advisors.
Improve Milk Protein Content Monthly discussion groups on profit & protein
  Information campaign on milk recording & breeding index
 

Use Dairy Herd Monitor to improve practices on farms.

Farm walk series on Monitor Farms

  Provide fertiliser plans
  Farm visits / media articles / newsletters
Second Quarter – April to June
Evaluate Client Development Options 'Planning Post Fischler Programme'

Run three group events for advisors

Individual visits to complete 'Way Forwad Action Plan'

Discuss option in newsletter

Improve Dairy Herd Profitability Follow up on Cost Control Planner
  Complete Profit Monitors ‘03
  Newsletter / Media articles
  Monthly discussion group meetings
Improve Milk Protein Content Information on breeding index, and milk recording
  Use Dairy Herd Monitor to improve farm practices.
  Entries for Protein 350 competition
 

Farm walks on monitor farms.

Protein 350 Open Day

  Monthly discussion group meetings
  Provide fertiliser plans
  Farm visits / Media articles / Newsletters
Third Quarter – July to September
Evaluate Client Development Options 'Planning Post Fischler Programme'

Run three group events for advisors

Individual visits to complete 'Way Forward Action Plan'

Discuss option in newsletter

Improve Dairy Herd Profitability

Complete Profit Monitors for 2003

Follow up on Cost Control Planner.

  Newsletter / Media articles
  Monthly discussion group meetings
Improve Milk Protein Content Protein 350 competition judging
Promote quality mid season grass
 

Local re-seeding demonstrations

Use Dairy Herd Monitor to improve practices

  Monthly discussion group meetings
  Farm visits / media articles / newsletter
Fourth Quarter – October to December
Evaluate Client Development Options 'Planning Post Fischler Programme'

Run three group events for advisors

Individual visits to complete 'Way Forwad Action Plan'

Discuss option in newsletter

Improve Dairy Herd Profitability

Monthly discussion group meetings

Complete Profit Monitors

  Short courses on financial management
  Newsletter / Media articles
Improve Milk Protein Content Monthly discussion group meetings
  Open days on monitor farms.
  County seminars
  Use INRAtion programme to formulate rations.
  Use Dairy Herd Monitor to improve practices
  Farm visits / Media articles / Newsletters
Public Events 2004
Short Financial Courses 40 to commence
Open Day on Farms of Protein 350 Competition Winner April
National Liquid Milk Conference February
Grassland Farm Walk Series (Monitor Farms) March, June, September
Moorepark Open Day May
National Dairy Conference November
National Seminar Series (Each County) November - January
In-Service Training 2004
Duration (Days) Location Approx. Date Content
 
All Dairy Advisers

Bi-Monthly

1 Day

Local District Throughout the Year Advisers to meet as Discussion Group to discuss time critical Management/Financial Management issues and computer programmes
2 Day Moorepark February Recent Research and Financial Management
 
Relevant Dairy Advisers
1 Day Kilmaley/ Solohead June Grass/Clover Management
 
Education Officers
2 Days Athenry/ Kildalton July Relevant Topics & Nutrition

Programme Benefits - €M

Table 3 spells out the national benefits based on 15,000 clients of achieving the targets set out in the Teagasc National Dairy Programme. There are some overlaps in programme areas, meaning that all of these benefits cannot simply be added together to give the total national benefit. For example, there is an overlap between reducing common costs and increasing grazing days. However, when allowance is made for overlap items, we are talking of a potential gain to dairy farmers in excess of €84m million per annum.

Table 3 - National Programme Benefits €m
  2000 2006 Value
Common Costs (litre) 15.3c 14c €46m / annum
Protein 3.27% 3.47% €38m / annum
Grazing Days (95c/Day) 245 285  

Programme Evaluation

In Table 3 the baseline position for 2000 has been set down for key objectives. Teagasc aims to have a major impact on at least 15,000 dairy clients over the period to 2006 and specific targets are set out in Table 3 for each key objective. Progress will be measured on an annual basis for each of these targets.

Progress in the Planning Post Fischler Programme will be evaluated by numbers completing the programme initially and by follow-up surveys on the progress of action plans after a 1-2 year period.

With regard to common costs and profits, Teagasc will rely on National Farm Survey data and on samples of clients that will be analysed using Profit Monitor. Supplementary evidence will also be used from Dairy Herd Monitor data. An economic assessment will be carried out every three years of monitor farms and discussion groups participating in Teagasc/Industry programmes.

Progress on our Protein 350 Programme will be evaluated by reference to CSO data on the protein content of manufacturing milk. Individual Co-op data on milk protein and A.I. data on usage of bulls with positive milk protein characteristics will also be used.

Progress on grazing days will be measured through farmer surveys, joint Teagasc/Industry programme evaluations and information from Dairy Herd Monitor.

NATIONAL CATTLE ADVISORY PROGRAMME

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

Irish beef production represents approximately 7% of EU beef production. Beef self sufficiency in Ireland was 820% in 2002 with a consequent need to export over 85% of production. The export value of beef and live cattle amounted to €1,224 million in 2002, which amounted to 18% of the total export value of agri-food, drinks and tobacco. Export refunds on beef sales in 2002 amounted to a further €187 million. The destination of Irish beef exports over the period 1998 to 2003 is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Destination of Irish beef exports - % share of total
Destination 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 (F)*
Intervention / SPS 3% 2% 0 31% 2% -
Third Countries 55% 54% 51% 11% 20% 16%
U.K 17% 17% 22% 43% 52% 53%
Other E.U 25% 27% 27% 15% 25% 30%

* Figures for 2003 are forecasts as of late 2003

National gross output from cattle in 2002 was valued at €1,168 million accounted for 25.5% of gross agricultural output. In addition a further €826 million was earned by the cattle sector in direct payments excluding payments under animal health schemes, REPS and new based Compensatory Allowance Scheme.

Approximately 95% of Irish farms have a cattle enterprise and cattle constitute the principal enterprise on over 50% of Irish farms. Average farm size is small, income per hectare is low, cattle farming has a very heavy dependence on direct payments and on up to 55% of cattle farms the farmer or spouse has an off farm job.

The national cattle herd amounts to over 7 million head and includes approximately 1.25 million dairy cows and 1.15 million sucker cows. Approximately 64,500 herd owners held the national sucker quota in 2002 and the average application per applicant was just over 17 cows.

  • Almost 46% of sucker quota holders had 10 cows or less in 2002 and this group held 15% of the national sucker quota.
  • 17,950 quota holders held quotas over 20 cows in 2002 and at an average herd size of 38 cows held 62% of the national sucker quota.
  • Almost 5500 quota holders held quotas over 40 cows in 2002 and at an average herd size of 61 cows, held 30% of the national sucker quota.
Table 2: Cattle farming in Ireland in 2002
  All Cattle Farms Cattle Farms with over 0.75 Standard Labour Units
Cattle System Cattle Rearing Cattle Other Cattle Rearing Cattle Other

% of Farm Population

Average Farm Size (adjusted/ha)

Total Premia Receipts

€/ha (incl.REPS & DACAS)

F.F.I. €/ha

% Premia Retained as Income

% With Off Farm Job

27%

24.5 ha

€443

€316

71%

55%

23%

29 ha

€484

€329

68%

49%

3.2%

49 ha

€478

€366

77%

47%

4.7%

63 ha

€494

€414

84%

35%

Source: Teagasc National Farm Survey 2001

Applications for slaughter premium in 2001 indicate the small scale of Irish beef finishing systems with 101,673 applicants at an average of 19 per applicant for the year.

SLAUGHTER PREMIUM 2001:

75% of applicants with 1-20 animals and 25% of cattle

17% of applicants with 21-50 animals and 29% of cattle

9% of applicants (8726) with over 50 animals and 46% of cattle

Applicants for special beef premium in 2001 show an average application for 1st stage premium (including bull pr.) and second stage premium of 24 head.

In 2001 88% of applicants for SBP applied for 1-50 head (incl 1st and 2nd

Stage) and accounted for approximately 52% of animals applied on. Almost 9,500 applicants applied for over 50 head with almost 3,000 applicants with over 100 head applied on between 1st and 2nd stage SBPr.

Carcass quality of Irish steers is best described by the carcass classification results. The ideal carcass grades for best-priced markets in U.K. and mainland Europe are conformation grades E, U and R with fat scores of 3 and 4L.

Results for steers for 1998 with fat scores 3 and 4L are:

- U3 and 4L 2.4% of steers

- R3 and 4L 14.2% of steers

As animals grading U and R with 3 or 4L fat are predominantly from the sucker herd this indicates that only about one third of sucker herd progeny are ideally suited to the best markets within the E.U.

Future Outlook

Given that an essential market requirement is to produce beef from cattle under 30 months this will result in a lower land requirement in future for a younger and smaller national cattle herd - in 2000 approximately 40% of prime cattle kill was over 30 months. Teagasc FAPRI-Ireland has completed a medium term analysis taking account of the Mid-Term Review and assuming full decoupling and project a reduction of up to 24% in Ireland's suckler herd.

Changes in the premia system may impact on future cattle production systems in Ireland. Decoupling of premia and moving to an area-based system could provide opportunities to efficient producers to increase returns and incomes while the least efficient producers may reduce stock levels.

Following Ireland's decision to fully decouple direct payments from production, farmers will need to re-examine their current production systems with a view to repositioning their farm business post decoupling. Teagasc are putting a Planning Post Fischler Programme into action to assist farm families to make the key decisions that will determine their futures. The programme will use a combination of group discussion followed up with one to one contact to help farmers plan the future direction of their farm business.

Much greater integration between production, processing and marketing will be essential to ensure production to satisfy consumer needs and rewarding all links in the chain with a premium that enhances profitability.

Industry Competitors

Market disruption due to BSE impacts and poor margins combined with the widespread availability of well paid off farm employment has encouraged increasing numbers of cattle farmers into part-time farming. Given the scale of farming outlined above and the modest income potential it is inevitable that part-time farming will continue and will most likely increase. Farm forestry is also competing for land that is carrying inefficient cattle enterprises. Teagasc is the only provider of independent technical advice to cattle farms through a network of drystock advisers at county level supported by regional specialist and research staff. Virtually all public advisory activity on cattle is organised by Teagasc.

Nutrition services to cattle farmers are provided for by private enterprise through industries involved in selling feed and /or feeding equipment to cattle farms.

Programme Objectives

Restricted market outlets, the need to expand mainland EU business following the decline in consumption due to BSE concerns amongst consumers and a requirement to export 85% of Irish carcass beef output will all continue to maintain pressure on the profitability of beef and cattle production. As a consequence, the key objectives of the Teagasc cattle programme are:

  • to reduce the common costs of beef production from the suckler herd to less than €1.30/kg liveweight
  • to improve breeding in the suckler herd so that proportion of suckler cow progeny suitable for EU markets increases from one third in 1998 to two thirds in 2006.

The Fischler reforms and Teagasc Planning Post Fischler Programme provides new opportunity to examine the overall farm business and its future direction post decoupling. The objectives of cost control and improved breeding are more critical in future for cattle farmers that are to secure a profitable foothold in our prime EU markets.

Planning post Fischler

Following the decision of the Irish Government to fully decouple direct payments from production, farmers will need to closely analyse their current situation with a view to repositioning their farm business post decoupling. Teagasc will assist farm families to make the key decisions which will determine their futures and that of their families.

As entitlements arising from the CAP Reform will be activated by farmers in 2005 it is planned to offer the programme to all our farmer clients during 2004 and 2005. The proposed target is that each adviser will put 30 farm families through the programme each year for the coming two years.

Participants will:

  • Calculate their own entitlements
  • Discuss case studies for monitor farms/sample farms
  • Estimate their current income/living expenses
  • Consider their priorities for the future particularly in the context of future family requirements
  • Calculate the impact of various on-farm and off-farm options on future income.

Reducing the common costs of beef production

Introduction

Reducing the common costs of beef production is the key to maintaining and increasing the competitiveness of beef and cattle production in Ireland

Rationale

The 2001 National Farm Survey (NFS) showed that cattle rearing farms only retained 56% of direct payments as farm profit while the top third of Teagasc monitor farms in 2001 retained 104% of direct payments as farm profit. The main reason for the clients’ low level of retention of direct payment is the higher common costs on these farms. Experience within recorded monitor farms shows that a common cost of less than €1.30 per kilogram liveweight is achievable - 42% of monitor farms in 2001 had common costs below €1.30 per kg liveweight.

Performance Indicators

The major indicators used to gauge the scale and participation in the Teagasc cattle programme are:

  • number of cattle clients
  • number of cattle discussion groups and number of farms participating
  • number of cattle monitor farms
  • number and participation in farm walks, demonstrations and seminars
  • number of profit monitors completed per year
  • percentage of farmers in the different cattle systems and size categories that are Teagasc clients as indicated in the NFS.
Effectiveness Indicators

The extent to which the programme is contributing to the achievement of this objective by farmers will be assessed by monitoring:

  • trends in the level of common costs on monitor farms with stable finishing systems
  • trends in common costs in NFS compared with trends on monitor farms
  • trends in gross margin and profitability levels for Teagasc client farms and non-clients in the NFS.

Improving the breeding in the suckler herd

Introduction

Despite the continuing concerns about BSE on mainland Europe and its impact on markets in the short term, the best prospect for Irish beef production is to establish a stronger foothold in EU markets where price levels are about 20% above Irish prices.

Rationale

Suckler beef breeding policy must increasingly reflect European market requirements. In addition, the greater requirement for quality assurance will necessitate closer linkages between breeders, finishers and processors. These links will help ensure that the price being achieved in specific markets is reflecting the price being paid to producers for cattle that meet the quality standards of these markets.

Performance Indicators

Indications of participation in the programme and the level of programme activity in relation to the breeding of the suckler herd are:

  • number of suckler clients
  • number of suckler monitor farms implementing best practice on breeding policy
  • number of discussion group sessions focussed on breeding policy
  • number of specific events – farm walks, demonstrations and seminars on this particular topic.
Effectiveness Indicators

The extent to which the programme is contributing to the achievement of this objective by farmers will be assessed through monitoring the:

  • number of weanlings exported to EU markets for finishing
  • percentage of home finished progeny grading E and U and R at fat score 3 and 4L.
  • measurement of the breed composition of the suckler herd through CMMS and calf registrations.
  • trends in AI use on suckler herds and the number of inseminations by top AI terminal sires and by AI beef bulls with good maternal traits.

Programme Target

Activities
Table 3: Cattle Advisory Programme Activity Targets
  2000 2001* 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Discussion Groups 70 70 80 85 90 95 100
Monitor Farms 20 20 30 40 40 40 40

Farm Walks/Demonstrations

Discussion Group Meetings

300

100

380

400

420

440

460

Meetings/Seminars 270** 70 70 70 80 80 80
Profit Monitors 25 50 100 140 170 200 220
Farm Visits 5,000 3,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Industry Joint Programmes 7 7 5 5 5 5 5

*Foot and Mouth restrictions impacted on activities involving groups in 2001

**Includes over 170 meetings/seminars on Agenda 2000 changes in 2000

Financial Impact

Overall the programme target is for a €50m increase in profitability from beef production within Teagasc’s 12,000 clients, broken down as follows:

  • Reduction in common costs to less than €1.30 per kg liveweight by 12,000 clients - €24m
  • Improved breeding in the suckler herd and consequent higher price as a result of achieving a better market return and participating in partnership arrangements, 12,000 clients @ €63 per cow, average of 35 suckler cows - €26m.

Description of Service

The Advisory Service to support the cattle programme will be delivered through the Technology and Business service for the larger more commercial clients and the Rural Viability Service for the smaller and part-time drystock farmers.

Deployment of Resources

The major resources for implementing the cattle programme are the 36 drystock advisers in the Technology and Business Service and the 90 general advisers in the Rural Viability Service.

Services are delivered through 28 county advisory teams, each managed by a Chief Agricultural Officer. Advisers are located at some 85 major Teagasc offices with a further 15 smaller offices servicing the more remote areas. Clerical back-up is provided at all major offices and a major investment has been made in computer facilities. Cattle Specialists based at Regional centres provide leadership and support for the programme and limited technician support is available to carry out recording on the Monitor Farms.

Service Delivery

Service delivery is normally on the foot of an advisory contract between the farmer and the adviser, agreed and paid for in advance. The contract details the level of advisory contact – farm visits, office consultations, discussion group membership. Other services such as REPS and participation in schemes may be delivered or supported during the year as part of the contract either by the drystock adviser or another advisory staff member such as a REPS Planner.

Marketing and Promotion

Pricing Strategy

Teagasc has adopted a pricing strategy that will maximise access to the service by farmers regardless of the size of their enterprise while at the same time ensuring that it recovers an increasing proportion of the cost of the service from larger more commercial farmers. All advisory charges are approved by the Minister for Agriculture and Food. Advisory charges are based on the size of the farm business as indicated by Income Units (IU’s) and the level of service provided.

Promotion

Teagasc advisory services are strongly promoted at national level through all the farming and general media (newspaper and radio), through Today’s Farm, the Teagasc magazine for clients and at national events. At local level the services are promoted in local press and radio, at seminars, farm walks, shows and newsletters. The Teagasc website, www.teagasc.ie, is an excellent shop window for the full range of services and programmes provided by Teagasc.

Contracts

Each county manager, with the assistance of the support staff and advisers, controls the billing for contract renewals, payment for services and can monitor the delivery of services to individual paid up clients through the computerised Client Management System (CMS). Each adviser completes a weekly diary, which is inputted with the system and is the basis for the monitoring of all services and programmes.

Client consultation and market surveys are carried out periodically to generate information to inform decision-making.

Advisory Methods and Levels of Activity Planned

Discussion Groups

Discussion groups have been shown to be the most effective advisory method in terms of increasing new practice adoption at farm level. Currently there are 70 cattle groups with a membership of over 1,000. Groups of 10-20 cattle farmers meet at least four times per year to discuss practices to improve farm profitability.

Monitor Farms

Teagasc currently uses a network of 40 cattle monitor farms to demonstrate and foster adoption of best practice on farms. Intensive advice and monitoring is carried out on each farm and results are made available to local farmers through open days on these farms and through the media.

Farm Walks/Seminars

Farm walks, seminars and demonstration in marts concentrate on time critical information and quality issues. These are held for major office catchment area and at regional locations.

Farm Visits

As part of an advisory contract advisers visit clients to discuss problems on a one-to-one basis. Expansion in this area of work is not envisaged but client demand is likely to sustain a steady demand for this aspect of service.

Profit Monitors

Profit monitor is a computerised programme to analyse financial performance on farms. Drystock profit monitor provides detailed analysis of output, premia and costs both per hectare and per kg beef liveweight.

Joint Programmes

Teagasc currently has 5 joint development programmes in the cattle area. These programmes involved personnel from both sides co-operating in advisory efforts to achieve mutually agreed objectives.

Any laboratory or IT work necessary to service contracts is charged for separately. New methods of servicing clients via on-line discussion groups and interactive IT services will be developed.

The targets for activities planned are set out in 3.1

Monitoring and Evaluation of the Programme

Programme monitoring against the targets set will be carried out using the CMS and other records of activities. These are based on the completed adviser’s diaries.

Programme evaluation is an ongoing process. At the end of each year, the Directors of Operations will report to the Teagasc Authority on the outcome of the programme. This report is based on information provided by each county, measurements of performance of the Monitor Farms, output trends and on the detailed results of the National Farm Survey. A mid-term review of the impact of the programme will be carried out using both the NFS and a more detailed sample survey of clients.

National Sheep Advisory Programme

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

Approximately 35,000 farmers farm about 3.9m breeding ewes. The hill areas have a population of about 1.2m breeding ewes with the remainder on the lowland. Sheep account for about 8% of gross agricultural product and make up more than 50% of farm income on 17,000 farms.

The average flock size is 111 ewes. About 67% of sheep meat produced is exported, mainly in carcass form and 82% of total exports go to France.

Future Outlook

In the new era post decoupling, further rationalisation will take place in the industry. The projection for 2012 from Teagasc FAPRI-Ireland Group is for breeding ewes numbers to decline to 2.8m.

Industry Competitors

The scarcity of skilled labour and the decline in the real income of sheep farmers in recent years has resulted in several thousand farmers leaving the sector.

Teagasc is the main provider of technical advice to sheep farmers. The County advisory service is supported by specialist and research staff and virtually all public advisory activities relating to sheep in recent years have been organised by Teagasc.

Programme Objectives

The overall objective of the Teagasc sheep advisory programme is to improve flock profitability through improved performance and reduced labour input.

As the ewe premium payment will be fully decoupled from January 2005, sheep farmers will have a choice of whether to stay sheep farming or not.

Under the new Teagasc Planning Post Fischler Programme, (PFP) guidance will be given to sheep farmers as to the pathways to profit for the future. Much of the activity in the PFP relating to sheep will be driven by the objectives of the 2004 programme.

Cross compliance being implemented in 2004 means that all hill farmers with commonage grazing must join an Environmental Protection Scheme. Teagasc staff will play a key role in delivering this service. Research data from the Teagasc Hill Farm at Leenane will be used to provide support for advisers and knowledge for farmers in this new task.

Specific Objectives

Planning post Fischler

Following the decision of the Irish Government to fully decouple direct payments from production, farmers will need to closely analyse their current situation with a view to repositioning their farm business post decoupling. Teagasc will assist farm families to make the key decisions which will determine their futures and that of their families.

As entitlements arising from the CAP Reform will be activated by farmers in 2005 it is planned to offer the programme to all our farmer clients during 2004 and 2005. The proposed target is that each adviser will put 30 farm families through the programme each year for the coming two years.

Participants will:

  • Calculate their own entitlements
  • Discuss case studies for monitor farms/sample farms
  • Estimate their current income/living expenses
  • Consider their priorities for the future particularly in the context of future family requirements
  • Calculate the impact of various on-farm and off-farm options on future income.
Lamb Performance and Market Suitability
Lamb Output

A target of 150 lambs weaned per ewe joined with rams for March lambing lowland flocks is the key pathway to profit in sheep for the future.

This can be readily achieved provided there is an effective breeding programme for an individual flock. Events during the year will focus on the use of prolific sheep breeds such as the Belclare.

Lamb Growth Rate to Weaning

Achieving a target flock weaning weight for March lambing flocks of 35 kg will allow 65% of lambs to be ready for sale by the end of September. This is a substantial increase from the present level of 55%. Figures from the TET project show that 50% of flocks are achieving the 65% September target. This would contribute an extra €900,000 per year or 90c/lamb across 1m lambs.

Through a more effective dosing programme to optimise parasite treatment, producers could save one dose per lamb – the direct financial benefit of this is €190,000 per annum saving on product.

With hill flocks the target is a minimum of 22 kg liveweight in early September for all Scottish Blackface lambs. Research data from the Teagasc Hill Sheep Farm at Leenane shows clearly how this can be done. In the new era hill sheep farming will not be driven by keeping large numbers for premium payments, rather by producing lambs with better weight for age in an environmentally friendly manner.

Achieving better weight for age in Scottish Blackface flocks would add up to €8 extra in lamb price. This is potentially worth an extra €1 million to hill farmers.

Lamb Quality

The use of information on slaughter weight and grade for individual lambs will benefit farmers in lifting the overall percentage of slaughter lambs that are suitable for export from the present 55% to 65%. This would contribute an extra €1.25/lamb across 400,000 lambs or €500,000 per annum.

Make More Efficient Use of Labour

A recent Teagasc study of labour requirements on client sheep farms showed a wide variation of between 5 – 10 hours per ewe in total annual time spend looking after breeding ewes. The specific aim is to reduce the overall labour input by 1 hour per ewe per year on client farms by 2006.

The direct financial benefit of this is €6 per ewe per year across 0.75m ewes or €4.5m per annum to the industry.

Effective lameness control will contribute to reduced labour and better flock performance. An evaluation carried out under the TET project will be used as guide for future advice to farmers.

Performance Indicators

The main performance indicators on the implementation of the sheep programme are:

  • the number of sheep farmers that are Teagasc clients and the proportion of the national sheep flock on these farms
  • the number of sheep Monitor Farms
  • the number of and participation in public events – farm walks, demonstrations and seminars
  • the number of sheep discussion groups.

Effectiveness Indicators

The extent to which the sheep advisory programme is contributing to improving lamb performance and market suitability will be assessed using information on lamb sales patterns from the National Farm Survey. Information from individual client farms will also be available as well the information from the Monitor Farms.

Lamb quality information will be derived from data produced by meat plants and Teagasc/Department of Agriculture surveys and returns.

A baseline study on labour use on sheep farms now exists and will be repeated in 2005 in order to measure change over the period.

Programme Targets

Activities
Table 5 Sheep Advisory Programme Activity Targets
  2004 2005 2006

Discussion Groups

Monitor Farms

Farm Walks/Seminars

Farm Visits

Newsletters

21

20

70

4,800

10

22

20

70

4,700

10

22

20

70

4,700

10

Description of Sheep Advisory Services

Some 20 advisers play a lead role in the delivery of the sheep programme. They may also be involved in other programmes for dry stock clients e.g. Planning Post Fischler programme and the Environment Programme.

The advisory service is supported directly by 3 regional specialists.

Programme delivery will be through a mix of activities e.g. individual farm visits, Discussion Groups, farm walks/seminars, Monitor Farms, newsletters and research open days, targets for which are shown in Table 5.

National Tillage Crops Advisory Programme

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

Tillage crops occupy 9% of the total area farmed in Ireland and account for €400 millions (7%) of Gross Agricultural Product. The importance of the tillage sector is underlined by the fact that 40% of the 47,500 jobs in the food-processing sector are derived from tillage crops.

Bread and flour confectionery accounts for 5,500 jobs, grain milling and animal feeds account for 2,800 jobs, the sugar sector accounts for 4,300 jobs with a further 6,100 people working in the drinks sector.

The area under crops and the number of farmers growing crops has been in long-term decline but nonetheless grain output has remained static at 2m tonnes.

The number of growers has fallen from 100,000 in 1975 to around 16,000 at the present time while the area under crops has fallen from over 0.5 m ha to 360,000 ha.

Spring barley is the most important crop in Ireland, comprising of 160,000 ha, followed by winter wheat, 60,000 ha, sugar beet, potatoes and oats.

Exports of crop related products are not significant and, in fact, Ireland is a net importer of approximately 3m tonnes of feed grains and substitutes.

Future Outlook

Looking towards the future, the tillage sector in Ireland will continue to be rationalised and become more specialised. By 2010, it is reckoned that there will be 1,000 specialised full-time tillage farmers with close to 250 ha each. There will be a further 5,000 to 6,000 smaller part-time operators combining tillage with off-farm work or as a secondary enterprise. The future of the sector looks secure based on the likely future demand for crop products and the fact that Irish yields are the highest in the world.

Internationally FAPRI analysis indicates that €/$US exchange rate and demand for cereals in developing countries will be the determinants of trends in demand and price of cereals in the future. Projected EU and Irish cereal prices are flat to slightly down.

Industry Competitors

Competition for Teagasc tillage advisers exists in the form of some 250 advisers/salespersons who work for retail merchants and agro-chemical companies. Because of the wide diversity of roles which Teagasc advisers fulfil, industry personnel are in a position to visit more crops during the crucial early growing season. Teagasc advisers, however, have the advantage of impartial independent advice backed by research and specialist staff. Discussion Groups also have given Teagasc a foothold with leading tillage farmers.

Programme Objectives and Targets

The three key objectives of the tillage crops advisory programme are to give farmers guidance on options for the future following the Fischler agreement, to achieve satisfactory margins from grain and to achieve best husbandry practice on all tillage farms.

Planning post Fischler

Following the decision of the Irish Government to fully decouple direct payments from production, farmers will need to closely analyse their current situation with a view to repositioning their farm business post decoupling. Teagasc will assist farm families to make the key decisions which will determine their futures and that of their families.

As entitlements arising from the CAP Reform will be activated by farmers in 2005 it is planned to offer the programme to all our farmer clients during 2004 and 2005. The proposed target is that each adviser will put 30 farm families through the programme each year for the coming two years.

Participants will:

  • Calculate their own entitlements
  • Discuss case studies for monitor farms/sample farms
  • Estimate their current income/living expenses
  • Consider their priorities for the future particularly in the context of future family requirements
  • Calculate the impact of various on-farm and off-farm options on future income.
Achieve satisfactory margins by reducing common costs per tonne.

Tillage farmers must target a margin, which will allow them to grow the business. Cereal growers have very little influence on the price paid for grain but can influence the level of inputs and the yield. Thus cost per tonne is a useful parameter to compare the level of efficiency inter-farm. Here we are using common costs, which are total costs excluding interest, hired labour and lease of land. The objective is to reduce common costs by €6/tonne to €96/tonne by 2006 i.e. €1/tonne/year. The Teagasc Farm Management Survey (FMS) indicates that the common cost/tonne for all cereals in the years 1997-1999 was €102/tonne.

Yield has been and will continue to be the main driver of profit on tillage farms. The objective of achieving common cost of €98/tonne (for 2004) will best be achieved by optimising yields through top class management and by pairing costs wherever possible without sacrificing yield and quality. Achieving common costs of €96/tonne has the potential to improve income by €10.5m per year on Teagasc client farms by 2006. However, optimising area aid will be essential to maintaining satisfactory margins. The contribution of direct payments to average FFI in Tillage Systems increased from 79% in 2000 to 111% in 2002.Tillage advisers play a major role in ensuring that growers optimise their area aid valued at €122m in 2003.

Achieve Best Husbandry Practice on all Tillage Farms

Teagasc will promote environmentally sustainable farming by soil analysis and judicious use of nutrients. Imbalance of major, secondary and trace elements is causing serious problems on many farms. Concern with the excessive use of N and P will have to be addressed. REPS is addressing these concerns on the less intensive farms. A campaign on the value and necessity for soil analysis will be aimed at intensive growers.

The objective is to increase the number of S4 soil tests by 25% in the period 2001-2006.

Evaluate by tracking numbers at Johnstown Castle.

Critical use of plant protection products

Research and decision support systems will be used to guide good practices.

The Cereal Grain Quality Assurance Scheme

This scheme will be promoted and growers will be supported to fulfil the details of the scheme.

The objective is to have at least 50% of growers in the scheme by 2006, rising from 16% in 1999.

Evaluate by tracking numbers in the scheme.

Rationale

Farming post the Fischler agreement and decoupling of direct payments from production will present new challenges and opportunities for farm families. Teagasc advisers and specialists will help clients assess their current technical and financial situation and outline future options in a special programme “Planning Post Fischler” over the next two years.

Maximising income from grain production can be achieved both by increasing yields and by cutting costs. Higher value crops e.g. sugar beet, potatoes, wheat and malting barley will be included in the crop mix where suitable land and markets are available. Grain output per hectare is not limited by quota restraints, as is the case of milk production.

Tillage advisers have received substantial training on farm business/financial analysis and planning in recent years. They are increasingly delivering this service on farm and via short courses. Tillage advisers now cover the whole range of farm activities from finance to technology for a range of crops including cereals, wholecrop forages, maize, roots (beet, potatoes), oilseeds, linseed, pulses (beans, lupins, peas) and setaside.

Performance Indicators

Participation in the programme and a high level of activities is a good indication of the value placed on the programme by clients. The main performance indicators for the tillage programme will be:

  • number of tillage clients and percentage of tillage crops grown on their farms.
  • number of tillage Discussion Groups
  • number of tillage Monitor Farms
  • number and participation in Farm Walks and Seminars
  • number of Profit Monitors completed each year
  • other activities such as Business Plans completed and short courses provided.
Effectiveness Indicators

The extent to which the tillage advisory programme is contributing to achieving the overall objectives will be estimated by:

  • using the National Farm Survey to monitor developments on client farms and non-client farms
  • monitoring crop mix and yields from CSO data
  • monitoring data on nutrient use and trends in soil analysis results
  • using tillage profit monitor to analyse the performance on a selection of client farms
  • using the Monitor Farms to develop benchmarks against which ongoing performance can be measured.

Programme targets

Activities

A comprehensive range of activities, as set out in Table 1, will be carried out in order to implement the programme.

Table 1: Tillage Crops Advisory Programme Activity Targets
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
DISCUSSION GROUPS 23 24 26 27 28 29 30
Monitor Farms 3 3 16 16 16 16 16
Farm Walks/
Seminars
46 46 46 46 46 46 46
Profit Monitors 75 75 150 225 250 280 300
Farm Visits 3,660 3,660 3,660 3,660 3,660 3,660 3,660
Farm Business Plans - - 60 120 150 180 210

Financial Impact

Achieving of the programme targets will contribute to increasing income by over €10 m on Teagasc tillage client farms by 2006.

Description of Service

The tillage advisory programme will be delivered mainly by the Technology and Business Service.

Deployment of Resources

The tillage crops advisory service consists of 21 advisers from the Technology and Business Service who will service 1,800 intensive tillage farmers and some 960 other farms with tillage crop enterprises. Specialist support is provided through 3 tillage Specialists. These will keep staff abreast of technical and business development, organise in-service training and provide an essential link with the research programme at Oak Park and outside agencies such as UCD and commercial operations.

The principal vehicle for human resource management and staff development will be the PMDS. This process results in a clearer understanding of their role by the adviser and identifies the training needs necessary to achieve the programme objectives and to fulfil their personal and career goals.

Service Delivery

Service delivery will be primarily through the Technology and Business tillage adviser in each county who will be working within a defined geographical area. Client contracts will vary from a basic club service to a customised technology and business service including farm visits, Discussion Group participation and modular short courses.

Marketing and Promotion

Pricing Strategy

Teagasc will continue to adopt a moderate pricing policy as a means of maximising total client numbers and overall fee income.

Contract prices will be reviewed on an annual basis. Client consultation, adviser consultation and market surveys are carried out periodically to generate information for informed decision making. Advisory charges are set out in Appendix 1.

Promotion

Teagasc services will be strongly promoted in all media channels. Indirect promotion takes place through Teagasc's contribution in the agricultural media and strategic direct promotion of Teagasc events and services take place throughout the year. Teagasc publications, e.g. Today's Farm and Teagasc Crop Reports, are circulated to Teagasc clients and the agri-business world.

Controls

Numbers of contracts, fee collection and other activity targets will be controlled by each County Manager through a computerised Client Management System. Advisers input details of activity through a weekly diary.

Advisory Methods and Levels of Activity Planned

Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups have been shown to be the most effective method of new practice adoption at farm level. Currently there are 27 tillage groups with a total membership of 400. It is aimed to increase this to 30 groups by 2006.

Monitor Farms

Monitor Farms demonstrate the value of proven research at farm level. These will be the focal point for the advisory service in the county. The Monitor Farm will facilitate collection of key business and technical details as well as demonstration of Teagasc advisory messages.

Soil analysis and laboratory services for disease/pest identification are essential supports for the service. These are provided through Johnstown Castle and Oak Park and charged for separately. New advisory and communications methods are being developed using the latest Information and Communications Technology (ICT).

The Teagasc client web site, www.client.teagasc.ie is being increasingly used to promote and deliver services to clients.

Monitoring and Evaluation of the Programme

Programme monitoring against the activity targets set will be carried out using the CMS and other records of activities.

Programme evaluation is an ongoing process. At the end of the year, the Directors of Operations will report to the Teagasc Authority on the outcome of the programme. This report is based on information provided by each county, measurement of performance on the Monitor Farms, output trends and on the detailed results of the National Farm Survey. A mid-term review of the impact of the programme will be carried out using both the NFS and a more detailed sample survey of clients.

Tillage Crops In-Service Training Programme 2004
Date Target Audience Topic LOCATION
15 January Core Tillage Advisers Planning Post Fischler Oak Park
28 January Core Tillage Advises and Teachers National Tillage Conference Carlow
29 January Core Tillage Advisers and Teachers Technical Up-date Oak Park
26 February Core Tillage Advisers Planning Post Fischler +
Current Crop & Financial Management
Updating+Discussion
Oak Park
6 April Core Tillage Advisers and Teachers
(2 groups)
CURRENT CROP & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Updating+Discussion
Drogheda
7 April Kildalton
5 May Core Tillage Advisers and Teachers
(2 groups)
CURRENT CROP & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Updating+Discussion
Kilkenny
6 May Naas
9 June
10 June
Core Tillage Advisers and Teachers
(2 groups)
CURRENT CROP & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Updating+Discussion
Middleton
Athy
29 June Core Tillage Advisers and Teachers Research Programme
Open Day
Oak Park
7 September Core Tillage Advisers and Teachers Technical Up-date Oak Park
8 September Core Tillage Advisers Planning Post Fischler Oak Park
5 October Core Tillage Advisers Financial updating Tullamore
6 October Core Tillage Advisers Nutrient Management updating Tullamore

National Environment Programme

Main Objectives:

  • Process 4,000 new REPS 2 plans for clients
  • Provide improved post planning support for 16,300 existing REPS clients
  • Promote public awareness of and assist farmers to comply with the proposed Nitrates Action Programme and other EU and National water quality regulations
  • Protect Natural Heritage (especially the Protected Areas) through the promotion of sustainable farming in sensitive landscapes in line with the objectives of the National Biodiversity Plan

REPS Programme

Programme Objectives

  • Process 4,000 new REPS 2 plans for clients
  • Provide improved post planning support for 16,300 existing REPS clients
Background

There are about 37,000 farmers in REPS at present (1st Nov). Almost 6,000 of these are in REPS 1 and the remaining 31,000 are REPS 2 participants. Of the 39,500 farmers who completed REPS 1 contracts an estimated 21,500 have joined REPS 2. This indicates a high drop out rate between REPS 1 and REPS 2. The National REPS target of 70,000 participants by the end of 2006 has been revised downwards to 50,000. Teagasc currently has about 16,300 REPS clients. The aim is to contribute 23,000 towards the National target. The number of clients still in REPS 1 is estimated at 2,800 and these are due to finish their REPS 1 contracts over the next year. Teagasc has managed to retain its market share which stands at 42%.

Challenges

REPS is a complex scheme requiring accurate planning and careful checking. It is labour intensive and therefore requires constant attention to improve the efficiency of delivery. This is being tackled through simplification of the scheme, improvement in planning efficiency and by employing new technology.

Simplification

The Department made some progress towards simplification by replacing ownership documentation with the farmer declaration on the area aid application form. While the simplified plan format for extensive farmers failed, for logistical reasons, to get off the ground earlier this year it will provide the basis for the revised format arising from Mid-term Review.

Mid-Term Review

This comprehensive review of REPS was undertaken during 2003. Submissions were sought from all interested parties and significant changes in both content and payment levels are proposed subject to Commission approval. A greater emphasis on environmental enhancement and increasing biodiversity than here-to-fore is anticipated. The new scheme will be known as REPS 3 and is expected in the first quarter of 2004.

REPS 3

Discussions on REPS 3 are taking place between the Department and the farming organisations, prior to submission to the Commission for approval. The changes in the REPS format proposed will impact on the programme in 2004. The main changes include:

  • Extension of the scheme to include a greater number of farmers through changes in eligibility criteria
  • Increase in payment rates to farmers
  • Annual compliance checking by planners (Form 1 C) will be required in year 3 only
  • New simplified planning documentation
  • Greater environmental expertise required in the planning process
  • Introduction of new mapping technology

The removal of annual compliance checking by planners will pose a major challenge to maintain contact with REPS clients and maintain the client base. An integrated, competitively priced advisory package comprising REPS support (eg record keeping), relevant farm advice including options analysis and schemes will have to be devised to retain the present substantial revenue from servicing REPS clients.

New Mapping Technology

The introduction of electronic mapping has considerable potential to improve planning efficiency. The delivery of on-line maps and electronic map processing is the basis of a joint project between Teagasc and the Agricultural Consultants Association. Teagasc has also been working on the integration of the mapping process with the planning software. The existing planning programme will require significant changes to accommodate the new planning format. Teagasc will have to have the new system in place to avoid delay in the delivery of REPS 3 by the anticipated launch date sometime in the first quarter of 2004.

A CD-ROM containing the complete REPS 20 hour course syllabus has been launched and is available for the delivery of all such courses this autumn. Training on the delivery of the course and the use of this medium will continue to be made available.

Programme Priorities

The major priority for the Teagasc REPS planning service is to increase the client base (currently 16,300) in the face of a substantial fall off between REPS 1 and REPS 2. The removal of the end of year certification (Form 1C) in REPS 3 provides a challenge to concentrate on growing the business.

The important components of the REPS programme include:

  • Improve efficiency of REPS plan preparation by 20% through role out of new mapping system and streamlining of service efficiency at county level
  • Deliver end of year target of 4,000 new REPS plans.
  • Hold 175 approved 20 hour REPS courses
  • Offer new integrated advisory package to 16,300 existing REPS clients
  • Ensure efficient transition to REPS 3 to involve review/overhaul of planning software and procedures.
  • Implement quality control system

Water Quality/NMP Programme

Programme Objectives
  • Promote public awareness of and assist farmers to comply with the proposed Nitrates Action Programme and other EU and National water quality regulations
Background

The Nitrate Directive is expected to come into effect in the middle of 2004 and is likely to determine the priority activities of the water quality/NMP programme in the second half of the year. As expected, the Nitrate Directive will apply to the whole country. The formal designation order singed by the Minister earlier this year provides no operational details. This will follow in the Action Programme, which will address details such as stocking rate limits, slurry storage, spreading periods and best practice requirements. The Action Programme will become the basis of a statutory instrument and become legally binding. Ireland has already been before the European Court for non-implementation of the Nitrate Directive. An unfavorable judgement is expected in December which could mean the imposition of a substantial daily fine. The urgent preparation and submission of the Action Programme as a defence to the imposition of any fine is receiving top priority.

Nitrate Directive Implications

While the broad framework of the Action Programme is set out in the Directive, the implementation details will be important and could greatly impact on the intensive farming sectors. Take the stocking rate issue – the Directive specifies a maximum of 210 kg/ha organic N (2.5 dairy cows or equivalent /ha) falling to 170kg/ha (2.0 cows/ha) after four fears. The Government has agreed to a derogation system whereby intensive farmers will be able to avail of a derogation up to 250 kg/ ha (3.0 cows/ha) on an individual basis provide there is no conflict with the objectives of the Directive. The derogation process will involve risk assessment and the preparation of a specific nutrient management plan. The competent authority to adjudicate on the granting of derogations has not yet been decided.

A coherent strategy is required to retain the national limit of 210kg/ha organic N after the first four years. The EU Commission will have to be convinced that the practices set out in the Action Programme have been implemented. As a first step in this process Teagasc has just completed a nationwide survey of farm facilities and practices. A repeat survey will be undertaken after the four-year period to assess the impact of the Action Programme. Advice and education will have a big role in changing attitudes and practices and Teagasc has the major responsibility in this regard. The Action Programme will set out the advisory activities to enable farmers to comply with the new requirements and Teagasc is expected to deliver it. The requirements are reflected in this programme.

Additional Local Authority Powers

The sanctions available to Local Authorities under the Water Pollution Act (1990) have been strengthened to include agricultural bye-laws and compulsory nutrient management planning (NMP). Bye-laws, introduced under Section 21 of the Act, are now in force in parts of five local authority areas (Cavan, Cork, Offaly, Tipperary NR and Westmeath). They have been adopted in all cases to deal with specific problems in specific catchments listed by townland. Six more local authorities have made proposals to bring in bye-laws and a further five are assessing the need for them. So far, bye-law slurry storage requirements vary from 14 weeks in Offaly to 24 weeks in Cavan. In general, where a farmer submits a full nutrient management plan the bye-laws permit a 4 week reduction in the storage requirement. REPS farmers are generally exempt from bye-laws provisions on the basis they are already in compliance. Up to 2,000 farmers are currently affected by this measure.

There is significant overlap between these measures and the requirements of the Nitrates Action Programme. There is speculation that the latter may remove or reduce the need to introduce bye-law and the mandatory NMP provisions of the Water Pollution Act. This would make sense. Farmers would then have to cope with the record keeping etc. associated with just one set of regulations rather than several separate sets.

Programme Priorities:

Programme priorities to minimise nutrient losses from agriculture with specific reference to practices contained in Nitrate Action Programme to be implemented in 2004:

Public Good Service
  • Activate nation-wide public awareness campaign to ensure farmers generally are informed about the implications of the Nitrate Action Programme through c. 60 public meetings
  • Provide guidance to farmers generally on the compliance requirements of the Action Programme (advisory leaflet, media articles, local radio and Teagasc public web site).
Client Service

Provide guidance on the Nitrates Action Programme to farmer clients through Teagasc client web site, farm walks, discussion groups, open days, demonstrations, one-to-one advice etc.

Promote nutrient management planning (NMP) through Teagasc Monitor Farm network – a NMP to be prepared for each farm unless already in REPS.

Provide clients with nutrient advice to comply with the Action Programme including specific NMPs requirements of commercial clients seeking derogations to exceed 210 kg/ha organic N.

Deliver c. 300 NMP/farmyard assessments to comply with bye-laws and pollution control tax incentive scheme.

Process Farm Waste Management and Dairy Hygiene schemes for c. 850 clients and provide advice on farmyard/farm building design, including ‘low cost systems’.

Develop working relationships with new River Basin District (RBD) projects being established in compliance with the Water Framework Directive and deliver agreed programmes.

Participate in Inter-departmental Expert Committees on Nitrates Action Programme and ‘Low Cost’ Wintering Systems

Natural Heritage Programme

Programme Objectives

Protect Natural Heritage (especially the Protected Areas) through the promotion of sustainable farming in sensitive landscapes in line with the objective of the National Biodiversity Plan.

Background

Biodiversity is under an ever-increasing threat. Concern over extinction rates led to the signing of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. This imposed many obligations for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity. The National Biodiversity Plan, published recently, is designed to ensure Ireland fulfils its obligations under the Convention.

The Natural Heritage Programme will promote the objectives of the National Biodiversity Plan, relevant to agriculture, across all Teagasc programmes. Though the designated areas command special attention, most flora and fauna live in habitats outside these areas. To maintain biological diversity in Irish flora and fauna, all identified significant habitats need to be protected and maintained, A key issue is the role of protected areas. These comprise approximately ten per cent of the country and include Natural Heritage Areas, Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas

NPWS Scheme

The introduction of cross compliance in SACs and SPAs will require farmers to follow a REPS plan or an alternative plan drawn up under the proposed National Parks and Wildlife Compensation Scheme. The latter scheme has recently received clearance from the EU Commission and preparations are being made to implement it. The scheme is expected to operate with the assistance of approved planners.

Programme Priorities

The main priority of the programme is to underpin the continuation of sustainable farming by promoting complimentary income generating activities including participation in environmental schemes. Other associated priorities include:

  • Promotion of awareness of biodiversity
  • Preparation of environmental plans for non-commonage target areas and common habitats
  • Integration of Commonage Framework Plan recommendations into REPS plans
  • Promotion of REPS or alternative Dúchas scheme as appropriate
  • Participation in working parties on the development and promotion of improved management practices for habitats and hedgerows, including courses for hedgecutting contractors.
  • Participation in joint projects on biodiversity enhancement with other stakeholders
  • Complete pilot loss assessment studies for DEHLG in selected SACs/SPAs (eg Callows)
  • Participate in Departmental working parties on the development of management prescriptions for the Priority Habitats

Programme Benefits

The main benefits of the environmental advisory programme are as follows:

  • 4,000 new REPS 2 plans will be prepared and an integrated advisory package offered to 16,300 REPS clients.
  • 175 REPS 2 courses (20 hr) will be delivered, with combined attendance of c. 4,000 farmers.
  • 500 (est.) nutrients management plans will be prepared to meet regulatory requirements on farms of clients and for demonstration purposes on Teagasc Monitor Farms
  • 850 Farm Waste Management and Dairy Hygiene schemes will be processed for clients
  • About 500 commonage framework plans and REPS SM A conservation plans will be prepared
  • Additional €60 million family farm income (FFI) supported for 16,300 Teagasc REPS clients. This is the projected net benefit after the deduction of costs.

Programme Evaluation

Quantifiable Outcomes

National statistics on nutrient inputs and investment in farmyard pollution control will be used to measure progress. Sources will include data from the CSO, Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Teagasc National Farm Survey and Teagasc Fertiliser Use Survey

Outcome Indicators

Quantitative criteria will be used to measure the level of implementation of programme activities as follows:

  • Number of new REPS plans completed.
  • Number of farmers who attended a 20 hour environmental courses.
  • Number of NMPs provided to non-REPS clients.
  • Number of Farm Waste Management schemes processed
  • Number of natural heritage plans (REPS SM A & framework) prepared.

These will be recorded through the Teagasc client management system.

Environmental Programme In-Service Training 2004
Target Group Topic Location Timetable Duration (Days)
All Advisers involved with REPS New REPS Athenry/ Kildalton 1st Quarter 2
REPS Contract Planners REPS Update Athenry/ Kildalton 2nd/3rd Quarter 2
Selected Advisers Nitrogen use efficiency (in context NVZs) Johnstown Castle 2nd Quarter 1
Environment Advisers Intensive Update To be decided Dec/Jan 2
Environment Advisers Habitat Assessment Regional 2nd Quarter 1
Selected Advisers Duchas Compensation Scheme Dublin 1s Quarter (provisional) 4
Selected Advisers H. Dip. In RCM NUI Dublin    
Selected Advisers (on successful completion of H.Dip. M.Agr.Sc NUI Dublin    

NATIONAL PLANNING POST FISCHLER PROGRAMME

Industry Analysis

The Opportunities for Farm Families Programme was launched in December 2001 and became fully operational in early 2002. The Programme will be relaunched in January 2004 and retitled the Planning Post Fischler Programme.

The National Farm Survey 2002 details the distribution of income as set out in Table 1.

Table 1: Distribution of Family Farm Income 2000-2002
(€000) <6.5 6.5-13 13-20 20-25 25-40 >40
% Farms
2000 42 22 12 6 10 8
2001 40 22 12 5 11 10
2002 40 22 13 6 12 8

40% of farms had an income of less than €6,500 in 2002.

Only 20% of farms had an income greater than €25,000.

Future trends as forecast in the Agri-food 2010 Report and now occurring as a result of the Post CAP Reform Measures suggests that there are many thousands of farm families to whom the Planning Post Fischler Programme is relevant.

Following the decision of the Irish Government to fully decouple direct payments from production, farmers will need to closely analyse their current situation with a view to repositioning their farm business post decoupling. Teagasc has now put in place a Planning Post Fischler Programme to assist farm families to make the key decisions that will determine their futures. This Programme will build on the experiences gained in the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme and will use a combination of group discussion and one to one contact to help farmers take stock of their current situation and to chart the future direction of their farm business.

Programme Objectives

The fundamental objective of the Programme is to help farm families generate additional household income and improve their quality of life. The Programme aims to help farm families to plan their future in the context of the changes brought about by the Post CAP Reform Measures.

The Programme aims to change the advisory approach to assisting farm families improve their viability. Through training and coaching advisers are being equipped to approach the issue of farm household viability in a holistic way. Advisers are trained to facilitate group meetings and to explore on-farm and off-farm options in a systematic manner as set out in the guidelines for Programme delivery.

The Programme will continue to further develop working partnerships with the agencies and organisations such as FÁS, CERT, ADM, the VEC’s and Institutes of Technology.

Planning Post Fischler Programme

Programme Goals

As entitlements arising from the CAP Reform will be activated by farmers in 2005 it is planned to offer the programme to all our farmer clients during 2004 and 2005. As a programme target, it is proposed that each adviser will put 30 farm families through the programme each year for the coming two years. Clients with less than 150 income units who participate in the programme can have free access because of funding through the National Development Programme and this will help Teagasc to meet the targets set out for the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme between now and the end of the National Development Plan.

Programme Format

It is envisaged that the programme will consist of two to three sessions followed by a one to one consultation/farm visit. During the group sessions participants will:

  • Estimate their current income/living expenses
  • Calculate their own entitlements
  • Discuss case studies for monitor farms/sample farms
  • Consider their priorities for the future particularly in the context of future family income and quality of life requirements
  • Consider the impact of various on-farm and off-farm options on future income.

The programme will be delivered along the lines of the Opportunities Programme model, with the additional feature of the mid-term CAP reform issue being incorporated into the sessions.

Alternatively, the group sessions can be built into the programme of existing discussion groups. These sessions will be dedicated to the Planning Post Fischler Programme and spouses/partners will be strongly encouraged to attend.

During the one to one consultation/farm visit, participants will agree with their adviser a clear set of action steps to achieve their objectives and a Way Forward Action Plan will be developed. Opportunities to achieve a viable income within the farm gate will be fully explored as well as looking at options outside. The Planning Post Fischler Programme will further integrate the enterprise programmes into a holistic programme that will help farm families examine their way forward in the context of total household income.

Targets

Programme Targets

Programme indicators have been established and targets quantified for the Programme on a regional and national basis as set out in Table 2. Targets have also been set on a county basis.

The national target for the duration of the National Development Plan is that 21,000 farm families take a clear and realistic look at their present position, examine on-farm and off-farm options and identify the best opportunities open to them. It is expected that 15,000 of these farm families will develop a “way forward plan” which will help them boost income and also improve their quality of life, and that the Advisory Service, in partnership with other agencies, will help families to implement the agreed Plan.

Table 2: Key Performance Indicators and Targets for the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme
Performance Indicator Baseline (2000) Mid-Term Target
(Total 2000-2003)
Target
(Total 2000-2006)
BMW Region
No. families completing viability analysis (Stage 1) - 4,950 11,550
No. families completing options analysis and preparing “Way Forward Action Plan” (Stage 2) - 3,300 8,250
No. families implementing plan and with improved viability - 3,300 8,250
S & E Region
No. families completing viability analysis (Stage 1) - 4,050 9,450
No. families completing options analysis and preparing “Way Forward Action Plan” (Stage 2) - 2,700 6,750
No. families implementing plan and with improved viability - 2,700 6,750
Nationally
No. families completing viability analysis (Stage 1) - 9,000 21,000
No. families completing options analysis and preparing “Way Forward Action Plan” (Stage 2) - 6,000 15,000
No. families implementing plan and with improved viability - 6,000 15,000

Specific Targets for 2004

  • To assist 30 farm families per adviser take a clear and realistic look at their present position and to guide them to achieve additional farm and household income and to improve their quality of life.
  • To further cement partnership agreements in each County with FÁS, VEC, ADM, LEADER and commercial companies so that a better quality programme can be provided through joint delivery.
  • To develop partnership programmes in a number of Counties with CERT, FÁS and the Institutes of Technology so that farm families can be offered training that satisfies their needs.
  • To provide relevant integrated in-service training for all Teagasc advisory staff and to provide guideline training for staff in other agencies who are delivering the Programme in partnership.
  • To ensure that an Advisory / Co-ordinating Committee is operating effectively in each County and that the agencies and organisation representatives have a clear understanding of the aims and objectives of the Programme.
  • To ensure that the farm families who have participated in the Opportunities Programme get every guidance and assistance to implement the measures set out in their Way Forward Plan.

Description of Service

Programme Outline

The Programme will be delivered in three distinct stages:

Stage 1: Helping farm families calculate their entitlements and identify the options available to them both on and off farm.

Stage 2: Options analysis leading to the development of a Way Forward Action Plan

Stage 3: Developing opportunities and implementation of the Way Forward Action Plan

Stage 1 is completed through a minimum of two group sessions. The family identifies the main farm household viability concerns and also the options for generating additional income either on or off the farm and/or improving the quality of life which merit further consideration and more detailed analysis.

Stage 2 involves one-to-one detailed analysis on the various options open to the family. A Way Forward Action Plan is developed which will identify specific measures to generate additional income and / or improve quality of life. It also identifies the specific advice and training needs of the family and, if appropriate, refer the family to other agencies for advice or training.

In Stage 3, the farm family implements the measures identified in the Action Plan. The family is supported in this phase by one-to-one advisory contact and/or attendance at training modules identified in the Action Plan. Attendance at monitor farms and discussion groups will provide further support to farm families participating in the Programme. Where referral to other agencies has been specified, Teagasc will arrange contact between the participant and the particular agency. There will be need for many farm families to sign contracts with Teagasc to deliver further advisory packages that have been signalled in the Way Forward Action Plan.

Programme Delivery

All Teagasc advisers in each County will deliver the Programme. At the core of this county team will be one or a number of advisers who are dedicated full-time to the delivery of the programme.

In the first stage of the programme groups of up to 10 farm families are recruited and invited to attend a group session. A high degree of emphasis is placed on getting the family rather than the farmer involved in the Programme. All Advisers are involved in identifying and recruiting participants whereas different members of the team may be involved at various stages in bringing a particular family through the Programme. Normally the dedicated members of the team deliver Stage 1 with involvement from other advisers, especially when their own clients are involved. The implications for the farm enterprise of decouplement and Post CAP Reform will be discussed.

Stage 2 of the Programme entails one-to-one advice, farm visits and consultations and is delivered by an appropriate member of the team depending on the family’s particular situation. In most cases this stage will be delivered by the enterprise adviser but specialised advisers will be available when their expertise is required.

Stage 3 of the Programme involves delivering further advice and training and supporting referrals as recommended in the Way Forward Acton Plan . All advisers are likely to be involved but one adviser within the County team has a co-ordinating role, ensuring participants are provided with the various training modules, advice and referrals recommended.

In some instances, the Programme is delivered in a partnership mode, particularly through the rural resource workers of the Area Development Management Service (ADM). FÁS will work on a partnership basis in each County, particularly at the referral stage and when skill-training courses are required by participants. CERT, VEC’s and Institutes of Technology will also offer training on a partnership basis. FÁS has a dedicated contact person in each County.

Deployment of Resources

The Programme continues to be led by a Programme Leader, closely supported by a full-time specialist. In addition the full team of Teagasc specialists will spend a proportion of their time at in-service training and follow on visits supporting the integration of the programme..

Management and clerical back-up is provided within each County. Funding will continue to be provided by the two Regional Assemblies as part of their Operational Programme.

Targets

Target Audience

The target audience for the Planning Post Fischler Programme is all farm families, both clients and non-clients of Teagasc. Participants for the Programme come mainly from the Non-viable “young” and Part-time farmers categories numbering 27,000 and 39,000 respectively based on the 2000 National Farm Survey. However all farm families will be encouraged to partake in the programme because of the necessity to engage in an option analysis approach to their future viability.

Recruitment

Teagasc are identifying potential participants for the Programme mainly from our existing client base but also from outside our client base by working in partnership with farming bodies, community workers and, in particular, ADM. A framework agreement between ADM and Teagasc has been developed to enable a joint approach to recruiting and delivering the Programme to the more marginalised farm families.

Promotion

The programme will be promoted through a National launch in January 2004 when the Minister will launch the Programme which will be aimed at all farmers. The promotion will emphasise the need to analyse the options available to farm families in the context of the Fischler decoupling arrangement.

The Teagasc website will be used to generate a profile for the new programme. Articles in “Today’s Farm” magazine will feature case studies of families who have participated in the programme. Similar case studies will feature in the Farmers Journal.

A promotional brochure will also be available. The co-operating agencies and the farm organisations will continue to promote the programme.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Programme Monitoring

A computerised programme register based on the Teagasc Client Information Management System (CIMS) records participation and delivery details. This register provides the basic data necessary for monitoring progress and for reporting. To facilitate monitoring and reporting, a new code has been added to advisers diaries to record all visits and activities / events delivered.

Monitoring the progress of the Programme will be based on the following performance indicators:

  • Number of participants in the Opportunities Programme.
  • Number of participants completing Stage 2 of the Programme (number of Way Forward Action Plans produced).
  • Number of farm visits / office consultations delivered as part of the Programme.
  • Number of farmers attending training courses.
  • Number of referrals to outside agencies.

Targets are set at National, County and individual adviser level in respect of these indicators. On an individual County basis, the CAO or a Rural Viability Adviser with a co-ordinating role for the Programme will monitor the progression of participants through the Programme from the recruitment stage through to their exiting the Programme.

He/she will produce periodic reports on the delivery of the Programme in the County. These reports will be based on the above indicators and on more specific information contained in the Way Forward Action Plan produced, i.e.,

  • The specific measure identified to increase farm income and efficiency.
  • the specific measures to improve viability identified in the Way Forward Action Plan.

Programme Evaluation

The impact of the Programme is measured through:

  • Sample surveys
  • Case studies

Baseline data will be collected on a selected sample of participant farms using the up-dated CIU (Calculation of Income Units) form. These farm families will be surveyed after participating in the Programme for a period of time to measure the economic impact of the Programme.

Case studies will be conducted with farm families who have not participated in the Programme and also with families who have participated. The purpose of those case studies will be to establish changes that effect the quality of life of programme participants and to portray these changes by reference to pre-identified behaviours, attitudes and opinions before and after participating in the Programme. Surveys will be completed with a large number of participants to identify quality of life issues.

National Horticulture Programme

Industry Analysis

Horticultural production has an output of €370m/annum at farm gate prices with a substantial part of the output exported. It also has an important role in import substitution. There are no market supports for the industry and producers are dependent on markets for income. Horticulture is a valuable diversification of agriculture production and can complement related production system where land, labour and capital are available or are surplus to requirements.

Within the horticultural advisory service there are five main teams which service the major sectors of the industry:

  • Nursery stock
  • Mushroom production
  • Potatoes
  • Fruit
  • Vegetables

From an advisory/development perspective these sectors have different issues affecting their development and the technical supports that they require.

Nursery Stock

Because of globalisation of world markets, and the removal of many barriers to trade, competition has increased in the domestic market. Investment in the industry has continued to increase with up to €3.0 m. of investment aid planned under the second round of the Scheme of Investment Aid for the Development of Commercial Horticulture. Overall growth has remained static but there has been significant diversification on nurseries to cater for the changes taking place in the retail market. Independent garden centres have been the main players in the market but there is now increased involvement by supermarkets, DIY market, hardware stores, florists etc. Nurseries have increased the range of stock and are also adding value to products by supplying ready-filled containers etc. to cater for these markets.

On the export market it is estimated that exports for 2002 in the amenity sector were valued at €14 m. with hardy nursery stock accounting for €6 m. Specialisation in the industry has resulted in the growth of export sales in young plants for growing on and also for impulse sales plants for the garden centre market. With the British ornamental plant market valued at one billion sterling, at retail level in 2002, there are increasing opportunities for Irish nurseries to target these markets.

The net value of hardy nursery stock produced in Ireland from 230 nurseries is €32.55 m. The industry has been expanding by 5% per annum and with the anticipated growth in the amenity market, all the indicators are that this growth will continue.

Growers are encouraged to concentrate on a smaller range of higher value plants and to aim at the developing export market.

Mushroom Production

Mushroom production is in a period of reducing profits. This is due to severe market difficulties and a price cost squeeze.

2003 Grower Profile (estimates)
CATEGORY 1 2 3
No. growers 140 105 35
Age 50+ 30-60 30-50
Fill in tons 14-16 25-40 35-45
B. repay/year 0 16,000 40,000-50,000
Cost of production 3,000 - 8,000 12,000-25,000 20,000-30,000
Mushroom price 80c 83c 83c
System 1 layer bags 2-3 layers blocks 3-4 layers shelves
Phase 2 2 and 3 2 and 3
Industry Analysis
  No.
Growers
Ph. 2 Compost
tonnes
Ph. 3 Compost
tonnes
Value Farm Gate
€m
2002 365 207,091 82,145 €137.64m.
End 2003 est. 280 189,236 100,000 €122.8m. est
End 2004 est. 220 184,236 105,000

The mushroom industry has grown to €114.28m in value terms. Teagasc has advisory contact with 70% of the sector through corporate and grower contracts. The major issue affecting production is the cost of labour, which has been increasing due to the success of the general economy.

The major development focus has been towards increasing output per labour unit. This has tended to favour the larger units. Three underlying factors affect throughput and unit costs.

They are:

  • increased compost fill
  • the shelf system replacing the bag system
  • the output per tonne of compost
Potatoes

The potato industry is worth €125m/annum year at farm gate prices. Some 900 growers grow about 14,000ha and 80% of growers are also cereal producers.

In 2002 following table shows a breakdown of the production from an end use point of view:

  Output Tonnes Value €m/annum % value
       
Seed 35,710 14.9 12
1st and 2nd Earlies 36,965 14.6 12
Maincrop 274,927 77.5 63
Processing 37,409 6.3 5
Crisping 43,692 6.7 6
Tops of seed 9,711 2.5 2
Total 437,054 122.6  

Scale and mechanisation are the keys to the survival of the medium to large specialised growers. The number of units washing potatoes is expected to double in order to meet consumer demand in the next 5 years.

Fruit

There are 4 main components to the fruit sector:

  • the fresh market
  • processing fruit (95% blackcurrants)
  • top fruit (table and processing)
  • other specialised crops (hops)

The key issues for the fresh strawberry market is the supply of produce outside the traditional short season. This momentum has led to an increase in specialised protected indoor production and this trend is set to continue.

The processing market is 95% blackcurrants. Some 323ha produce 6-7.5 tonnes per ha in a typical year but up to 11 tonnes in a good year (2001). Processing fruit valued at €2.54m is exported each year. Mechanisation has been the key efficiency factor and most of the equipment required for expansion is now in place.

The output from the top fruit sector is mainly desert and culinary apples. There are 34 growers with 400ha. The industry is under pressure from labour costs and from imports. The high yield and quality coupled with good demand in normal years will help to maintain the industry.

Processing apples for cider production have gone through an expansion phase with output expected to increase from 14,000 tonnes to a projected 25,000 tonnes of apples produced. Further expansion in area over the next 5 years will depend on the market outlet for cider, an additional 200-300ha is due to come into production after 2006.

Vegetables
  • In 2002, 4,272 hectares of field vegetables were produced
  • The estimated farm-gate value for field vegetables in 2002 was €43.9 million
  • The number of growers producing field vegetables in 2002 was 294
  • There was a total on-farm net equivalent of 889 people employed in field vegetables in 2002.

Dublin is the most important county involved in the production of field vegetables with 41% of the total field vegetable production area, 50% of the total farm-gate value and 32% of the total number of field vegetable growers. Leinster, in general, tends to dominate the sector with six of the top seven field vegetable producing counties (by area).

The growers with the largest production areas of field vegetables account for the majority of the total production. The top ten growers (by area) account for 23% of total production area and the top 50 growers (by area) account for 60% of total production area. The smallest 100 growers (by area) account for only 4% of the total field vegetable production area.

Cabbage and carrots are the two most important crops in terms of both production area and farm-gate value. In 2002, 918 hectares of cabbage were grown, with an estimated farm-gate value of €7.6 million. Approximately 694 hectares of carrots were produced with an estimated farm-gate value of €8.2 million.

The other most important field vegetables in terms of production area include cauliflowers (505 hectares), Swedes (475 hectares), broccoli (420 hectares), parsnips (295 hectares) and Brussels sprouts (276).

Programme Objectives and Targets

Nursery Stock

To increase output of saleable plants from 75% to 85% through improved infrastructure and achieving at or above 34,000 plants/labour unit.

To target specialised export growers focusing on production and quality systems to achieve export target of €7.5

To promote environmental friendly practices in crop production.

To measure and monitor efficiency factors, improving quality and reducing wastage.

Mushrooms

The survival strategy for the mushroom industry is to consolidate as many as possible of the Cat 1 and Cat 2 growers and improve technical performance and profit of Cat 3.

  • Increase the compost fill per mushroom house up to a maximum of 38 tonnes of compost.

Mushroom Large Houses : Top 20% of growers: put in a 3rd layer of compost and increase fill from 30 to 38 tons. Environmental equipment changes will be required like larger exhaust capacity and for summer growing alter the fan position and install the larger cooling radiator. This can increase both the output per labour unit on farms and mushroom output from 7,160Kg/crop to 9,068Kg/crop

Fifty per cent of growers: increase fill from 23 to 30 tons

Remaining 20% of growers : increase fill from 22 to 25 tons

Standard houses : a similar proportion compost fill increase will be the objective.

  • Increase average output of saleable mushrooms per ton of compost from 220 to 250kg/tonne.

The target for 2004 is to increase the proportion of growers achieving the 260Kg/tonne target from 20% to 40%. To improve output on less efficient producers to above the 216kg/tonne threshold.

Potatoes

To increase the tonnage of saleable potatoes per ha from 33 tonne/ha to 40 tonne/ha by 2006. Increase yield by one tonne/ha in 2004.

  • Increasing the tonnage of Rooster potatoes produced, both washed and unwashed. The number of growers achieving 40 tonnes/ha will be increased from 50% to 80% of growers by 2006.
  • To reduce the imports of Maris Piper used for the fresh chip trade.
  • To increase the knowledge and competency of sprayer operators on potato farms.
Fruit
  • To extend the range and season of fruits produced under protection. This will be achieved by increasing the area of raspberries, blueberries and cherries grown under protection.
Vegetables
  • To increase vegetable growers use of soil analysis as the basis for suitable nutritional programmes
  • To increase vegetable growers use of modern disease and pest control supports including crop walking and decision supports
Quality of all Horticultural Products
  • To provide training and advice to all client farmers so that they can meet the demanding quality assurance standards required in the marketplace.

Programme Targets

Activities
Table 9 – Horticulture Advisory Activity Targets
  Nursery Stock Mushrooms Potatoes Fruit Vegetables
Discussion Groups 1 11 7 2 3
Farm Visits 300 500 1,100 200 720
Training Courses 4 8 3 3 3
Clients 190 265 700 120 360
National Conference 1 1 1 1 2

Teagasc provides leadership in the horticultural enterprises by providing a technical service to as many producers as possible within its constraints of recovering part of its cost from client fees.

Teagasc also works closely with industry, sometimes in partnership, towards achieving the common objectives and a strong market led industry.

Delivery of Services

The Horticultural advisory area is specialised into development teams with some advisers involved in more than one area:

Staffing
  Staff involved Man-work years
Nursery Stock 4 2
Mushrooms 6 3.05
Fruit 4 2.6
Vegetables 6 3.3
Potatoes 29* 3.8

* Includes Horticultural and Tillage Advisers

Monitoring and Evaluation

Records of all courses held and their attendance will be maintained.

Nursery stock

Three lines in four nurseries will be followed from potting up to sale. Wastage, labour input and sale value will be recorded.

Mushrooms

Records of compost use and crop sales from the pack-house for each client will be recorded and efficiency benchmarked on an on-going basis. This will give a measure of progress in average fill and output per tonne of compost.

Potatoes

Yields on some 18 farms in 6 counties will be monitored to establish yield trends each year

Fruit

An assessment of protected fruit cropping, growth in sales and the expansion of existing growers will be carried out.

National Pig Advisory Programme

Industry Analysis

Pig production is concentrated in about 510 commercial units. The average size of breeding herds is 385 sows. Units with less than 100 sows produce about 2% of output.

Low pig price and price fluctuation are the major impediments to development. The average pig price during the last 10 years was 133 cent/kg deadweight, with a range in the annual average price from 102.2c to 163.90c/kg.

Production costs are rising. Feed costs have risen by about 8% during the past four years, but are set to jump significantly during 2004. Most non-feed costs (viz. labour, IPC licence compliance, manure transport, animal welfare regulation compliance, energy) are growing also.

While sow numbers were remarkably stable during the 5 years to June 2002, they have fallen by 4% in the last year (to 154,300 in June 2003). This compares to a 36% reduction in Northern Ireland since June 1998.

Sow numbers are likely to fall further, by at least 10%, by 2006, due to the ban on sow tethers from 01/01/06 and the expected reductions in margins. There will be a continued contraction in the number of pig units and pig unit owners as consolidation increases.

Pig production is a significant sector in the Irish agricultural economy with a farmgate value of €333m in 2002 – third after Milk and Cattle in output value. About 64% of output is exported, mainly to the UK market.

Pigmeat consumption per capita in the EU exceeds the consumption of beef, poultry meat and lamb combined.

Programme Objectives/Targets

The overall objective of the Teagasc pig advisory programme is to improve herd profitability through improved growth rates, litter size and slaughter weights.

  • The first target is to increase average daily gain from weaning to sale from 586g (2001) to 615g (2006). The 2002 outcome was 597g/day
  • The second target is to increase litter size from 10.78 born alive (2001) to 11.3 (2006). The 2002 outcome was 10.95 born alive per litter.
    The third target is to increase average carcass weight from 72.9kg (2001) to 74kg (2006). The 2002 outcome was 72.3kg.

The value of these targeted improvements extended to the entire industry would be approx. €16 million per year by 2006.

The first two targets will be measured by the Teagasc Pigsys recording scheme.

The third target will be measured by the Department of Agriculture, Food & Rural Development from slaughterhouse returns.

Description of Pig Advisory Service

The service to pig producers and the pig industry is currently provided by two specialists/advisers and three advisers.

The programme delivery will be largely based on individual farm visits. These will be augumented by one-day workshops, newsletters, conferences, seminars and discussion groups. This includes a comprehensive programme of Welfare workshops for all units, sponsored by the Department of Agriculture. Approximately 230 clients are being serviced directly. Workshops, newsletters and conferences are offered to all pig producers.

Pig Advisory Programme Activity Indicators
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Farm Visits

Workshops

Newsletters

Conferences

Discussion Groups

600

-

6

3

2

550

23

6

3

2

550

25

6

3

2

500

30

6

3

2

500

30

6

3

2

The overall cost of the pig advisory programme is estimated at £0.34 million annually.

Teagasc pig service is promoted through most media channels. Specialists/Researchers contribute regularly through farming publications, national conferences and local radio.

National Food Assurance Programme 2004

Food Assurance Trends

Regulatory and market forces are the major drivers of food assurance at farm level. The CAP Midterm Review brought a fundamental shift in EU farm policy. Cross compliance measures will tighten the link between decoupled support payments and EU food safety, animal disease and welfare requirements. EU food law requires all food producers including farmers to implement best practice in relation to food safety issues. Recasting of existing EU food hygiene legislation is likely to reinforce this trend.

Food assurance is a key component of overall market competitiveness. Sixty to ninety percent of production is exported in the beef, dairy, sheep and pig sectors. Total food exports exceed €6bn annually. Access to important markets is dependent on having verifiable food supply chain assurance in place. Farm and industry quality assurance schemes have become the norm in most sectors. Requirements are tightening as assurance schemes move towards common European (EN 45011) accreditation standards. Food chain assurance trends are also encouraging tighter supplier processor linkages.

Implications for Teagasc

Farmers are a key segment of the food supply chain. As food producers, they need to be kept fully informed of changing consumer, marketplace and regulatory requirements. Producers and trainee farmers also require knowledge and skills to implement best farm assurance practice.

Various food industry reports, including the Agrifood 2010 Report, strongly recommend closer producer processor relationships to meet increasing food chain assurance requirements. The Department of Agriculture and Food Statement of Strategy prioritises food assurance issues in relation to national food policy goals.

As the major provider of agricultural research, extension and training; Teagasc is in a unique position to help producers respond to food assurance challenges and requirements. Teagasc can also play an important role in supporting industry assurance programmes and partnerships as well as national food policy objectives.

The Teagasc Statement of Strategy recognises the challenges arising at both at market and regulatory level and places considerable emphasis on food assurance issues.

In the Teagasc context, farm food assurance embraces many issues including food safety, hygiene and traceability; food quality, animal welfare and disease/bio-security.

Programme Objectives

The key objectives for the Teagasc Food Assurance programme are:

  • Increase producer awareness of key requirements.
  • Develop and provide food assurance training modules and courses
  • Support national and industry programmes, projects and partnerships
Food Assurance Advisory Programme Activities for 2004
Programme Activities Targets

Information +Awareness

Food Assurance Online: rollout of information/learning website

Publications: Leaflets to developed in 2004

Food Assurance column Todays Farm

Press articles on food assurance topics

Discussion Groups: develop and pilot food assurance facilitation package for dairy discussion groups.

Spring 2004

2

All issues

ongoing

Ongoing 2004

Food Assurance Training Projections

Projections for the number of students /adult farmers likely to complete specified food assurance modules are as follows:

Teagasc vocational course students

Teagasc third level students (combined years)

Adult 100 hr management course participants

Other adult/industry (Pesticide, Farm Inspection, BASIS, local adult courses etc.)

Course Development

Continue content development /input into food assurance element of National Diploma courses

Scope and assess future course requirement in light of emerging EU food safety and animal welfare policy

500

280

400

200

Ongoing

Ongoing

Support for National/ Industry Programmes + Projects

Johnes Disease: Complement DAF/industry Johnes strategy

Support Bord Bia, Bord Glas, FSAI, DAF programmes/projects and industry partnership programmes.

Teagasc/industry programmes that support broad QA objectives

Teagasc clients participating in industry joint programmes

1st quarter

ongoing

16

5,000

Programme Monitoring and Evaluation

Programme effectiveness will be monitored and evaluated using the following indicators:

Information/Awareness Objective

  • Producer awareness/adoption of key quality assurance requirements.
  • Awareness/usage of Teagasc Food Assurance Online database.
  • Food Assurance leaflets, newsletters, articles published annually
Training Objective
  • Students completing assurance modules in vocational and third level courses.
  • Adult farmers and industry personnel receiving food assurance training.
  • Number of Teagasc staff receiving food assurance training.
Industry Support Objective
  • Teagasc involvement in industry programmes with QA objectives.
  • Producer success rate in meeting industry programme quality targets.
  • Teagasc support for/participation in other agency projects/programmes.
  • Feedback from producers/industry/ in relation to programme relevance.

Service Delivery and Marketing

Food assurance is one of the core areas specified in the Teagasc Statement of Strategy. The programme is directed at all Teagasc clients. Co-operation and liaison with all sectors of the food supply chain and relevant food agencies is a key element of programme delivery.

Programme development and leadership, co-ordination, industry liaison, technical support and public relations; is provided primarily by the Teagasc Specialist Service.

Food assurance training is mainly provided through the Teagasc Education/ Training Service and the Specialist Service. Local advisers and the Teagasc Specialist Service support industry and national programmes through Teagasc Commodity Programmes (e.g. Teagasc Beef or Dairy Programme).

The Food Assurance Online database will become a key vehicle for information dissemination to Teagasc staff, students and clients and to other food chain stakeholders.

Staff Training

Food assurance training for Teagasc staff is organised by the Teagasc Specialist Service in conjunction with relevant Teagasc managers and programme leaders. Training proposal for 2004 are:

  • Ongoing briefing of Teagasc staff on specific food assurance topics through the respective commodity inservice training programmes.
  • One day briefing on Johnes Disease for dairy /beef advisers in early 2004 ( delivery of this training subject to agreement with DAF)
  • One day training programme for selected college and county training staff in September 2004.

Food assurance facilitation skills training for selected dairy discussion group advisers(to be delivered through the routine training sessions for these advisers).

National Farm Safety Programme 2004

Industry Analysis

Fatality Rate

Farming has a very high fatality rate. Data over the last ten years show that, on average, 20 people (including 5 children) are fatally injured on farms each year. Farming has the highest fatality and accident rate relative to any other economic sector (Table 1).

Table 1: Fatal Accidents in Employment 1994 – 2003
Year Farming All Employment Sectors
1994 21 50
1995 28 78
1996 12 59
1997 15 48
1998 26 70
1999 23 69
2000 16 69
2001 24 51
2002 13 61
2003 18 63
Average 19.6 61.8

Agriculture accounts for nine per cent (CSO Statistics) of total gainful employment yet thirty three per cent of the fatalities occur in agriculture

Overtime there has been a variation in yearly fatalities, ranging from a high of twenty-eight in 1995 to twelve in 1996. There is no apparent reason for this yearly variation.

Accident Rate

The Teagasc Surveys on farm safety showed that there were 5,000 accidents in 1991, 2,000 accidents in 1996, 3,500 accidents in 1999 AND 3,001 IN 2001.

There are many reasons why farming has a high accident rate. Included amongst these are:

  • the farm is a home as well as workplace
  • increased mechanisation and the use of more powerful tractors
  • pressure on farm incomes means that safety investment may be postponed
  • many tasks are performed alone, often in wet conditions
  • farmers perform many different work activities in any one day.
Future Outlook

It would seem that without urgent action by farmers and intervention by many agencies, including Teagasc, the current trends are likely to continue.

Industry Competitors

Teagasc is uniquely placed to integrate the safety message on farms through its advisory and training programmes.

The role of the Health and Safety Authority (HSA) is inspectorial and to provide information to farmers on the legal requirements. The Department of Agriculture and Food include safety issues in its specifications for all farm buildings and animal handling facilities. The major input of the Farm Relief Service (FRS) is to provide farmers with a commercial service on Health and Safety.

Programme Objectives

  • that farmers, in maintaining a sustainable viable system of agricultural production, will adopt a safety culture that incorporates:
  • the use of best practice/safe systems of farming, and
  • the provision of safe plant, equipment and buildings
  • that Teagasc farms, (Colleges and Research) will provide the model of farming that demonstrates best practice in terms of safety
  • that key Health and Safety issues identified in the National Farm Safety Plan
  • are incorporated into Teagasc programmes
  • that farmers will have access to the information, training and advice necessary to farm in a safe manner

Specific Objectives

Objective 1
  • that farmers will be aware of their responsibilities and duties under Health and Safety Legislation
  • that all host farmers and farmers involved in Discussion Groups, Monitor Farms, and demonstration farms will adopt best practice for safe farming by:
    • preparing a safety statement and carrying out safety audits
    • taking action to eliminate hazards on their farms
    • providing safe plant, equipment and buildings as per audit listing
  • that 20% of all farmers will adopt practices similar to the above
Objective 2
  • that each Centre/College will have a current Safety Statement.
  • that each Centre/College will carry out regular safety audits.
  • that each Centre/College will have a Safety Committee.
  • that each Centre/College will maintain a safety file including activities, meetings and training.
Objective 3
  • that a safety module will be incorporated into all training programmes
  • that safety will be integrated into all aspects of advisory activities
Objective 4
  • three leaflets/brochures will be prepared and distributed each year
  • that Teagasc will continue to develop it’s internet site
  • that Health and Safety training courses will be offered to farmers
  • that advice on Health and Safety issues will be available to farmers
  • that media campaigns will highlight important safety issues

Programme Targets

The Farm Safety Programme differs from many of the other programmes in that many of the activities required for its implementation will not be stand alone activities but an integral part of other events, courses etc. The overall aim will be to have a safety input included in all appropriate public events and courses while at the same time ensuring that centres, colleges, Monitor Farms, Host Farms and Discussion Group Farms adapt Best Practice in farm safety. The following table summarises the target number adopting Best Practice, participants in courses with a safety input or module and other activities.

Table 2: Farm Safety Advisory Activity Targets
Programme Activities & Targets 2003 2004 2005 2006
Host Farmers adopting Best Practice in Farm Safety. 100 100 100 100
Discussion Group Farmers adopting Best Practice in Farm Safety

2,000

2,000

2,000

2,000

Monitor Farmers adopting Best Practice in Farm Safety 120 120 120 120
All Colleges adopting Best Practice in Farm Safety 8 8 8 8
Trainee Farmers completing Teagasc Training Modules in Farm Safety 500 500 500 500
Farmers completing specific Teagasc Adult Courses with a safety module 200 200 200 200
Farmers completing REPS Training on farm safety 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
Farmers completing Farm Safety Self Assessment Audits 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Teagasc Staff receiving in-depth training on Farm Safety 50 50 50 50
Teagasc participating in specific inter-agency Farm Safety Projects 3 3 3 3
Other activity targets Newsletters
Media Articles
Internet Database
Information Leaflets
4
8
Yes
4
4
8
Yes
4
4
8
Yes
4
4
8
Yes
4

Description of Service

Deployment of Resources

Two specialists (one with a remit in labor organisation) have been assigned to support this programme. Education Officers are the key links to implementing the programme at county level and their support and involvement is crucial to the successful outcomes planned. Education Officers and advisers will devote a proportion of their time to the safety programme.

Service Delivery

While the service will be available to all farmers, it will initially focus on Teagasc clients, host farmers and Monitor Farms. Education Officers will be responsible for ensuring that all host farmers are complying with Health and Safety best practice. Advisers will be responsible for ensuring that farms used for monitor, demonstration and discussion groups are complying with best practice in farm safety. Farm safety will be highlighted during special events, e.g. Farm Safety Week, Open Days at Teagasc Centres and the Ploughing Championships. Teagasc clients will receive the Health and Safety Newsletter, which will contain timely safety messages while the Teagasc publication “Today’s Farm” will also carry safety features.

Marketing and Promotion

The Teagasc Health and Safety service is promoted primarily through the media, in Teagasc publications and at major farming events. The strategy aims to create awareness of health and safety issues, a safety culture and to encourage farmers to take action to eliminate/reduce hazards on their farms.

Advisory Methods

The main advisory method used will be working with farm groups. Other methods used will include the farming media, Teagasc publications, leaflets and Open Days. Advisers will advise farmer clients on a one-to-one basis on all aspects of farm safety.

Monitoring and Programme Evaluation

The delivery of the H&S programme will be primarily monitored through the normal reporting mechanisms similar to other programmes.

The National Farm Survey (NFS) will be used to measure various indicators of safety on the farm and activity undertaken by farmers to reduce/eliminate hazards on these farms.

Specific studies will be undertaken through the Walsh Fellowship programme to measure the impact of the programme. National statistics and special studies will continue to be used to monitor the accident and death rate on farms.

REPORTS SUBMITTED BY PROGRAMME DIRECTORS WILL INDICATE THE LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR STAFF HEALTH AND SAFETY.

Farm Mechanisation Advisory Programme

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

Agricultural contractors play a central role in Irish farming. It is estimated that around 90% of the heavily mechanised work, such as silage making is done by contractors while the value of services provided according to industry figures is about €500 million a year.

The Teagasc National Farm Survey shows that the average farm expenditure on machinery was €6,965 in 2002, representing 23% of all farm costs (direct and overhead). This amounts to approximately €811 million for all farms in the country.

On dairy farms, the average annual expenditure on machinery was €11,881, representing 20.2% of all costs. This equates to €298/ha annually.

On suckler farms, the average annual expenditure on machinery was €3,667, representing 26.9% of all costs. This equates to €137/ha annually.

On tillage farms, the average annual expenditure on machinery was €16,722, representing 27.6% of all costs. This equates to €268/ha annually.

On sheep farms, the average annual expenditure on machinery was €4,061, representing 22.4% of all costs. This equates to €106/ha annually.

(Machinery costs include: Hire of machinery, depreciation and operating costs).

Future Outlook

Changes taking place in the structure of Irish farming will impact on machinery use and costs in the following ways:

Large intensive farmers and increasingly part-time farmers will continue to use contractors for silage making, slurry spreading and possibly fertiliser spreading. However, most will have their own modern tractors and equipment for winter-feeding. Financial institutions are reporting buoyancy in borrowing by dairy farmers for tractors and feeding equipment.

Extending grazing in dairying should reduce machinery use and costs.

Economies-of-scale in machinery use on tillage farms will require a continuing demand for contractor services and other options such as partnerships.

Efficiencies in mechanisation will only be achieved by recording the costs and analysing their implications

Industry Competitors

There is a strong core of machinery manufacturers in Ireland. There are approximately 76 Irish manufacturers. The main machines being manufactured are for winter-feeding, slurry handling, baling, bale handling/wrapping and trailers.

Competition is also strong in the milking equipment manufacture and supply sector.

The machinery trade sector is stable. There are approximately 100 machinery distributors.

There are over 2000 contractors in Ireland. The trend in contracting shows a decrease in numbers but an increase in scale and diversification.

Teagasc Competitors

There is a level of competition in some advisory recommendations, especially with regard to winter feeding equipment and milking parlour equipment. Otherwise, there is no external competition to Teagasc in advisory and training services in mechanisation.

Teagasc in association with PAC Ireland, (the agricultural contractors association) provide a dedicated training service to contractors.

Programme Objectives

To improve the profitability and viability of farmers and machinery contractors in relation to machines and mechanisation systems.

This will be achieved by focusing on the following areas;

  • Improving the financial management skills of machinery contractors
  • Making farmers more aware of mechanisation costs on dairy farms
  • Up-skilling machinery operators in the latest tillage and
  • grassland machinery
  • Developing and delivering computerised support tools for advisers
  • and teachers in the farm machinery and buildings areas – specifically
  • to enable the online access to standard drawings and fact sheets
  • Providing support to all Teagasc staff in the design, layout, specification and construction details of new and modified farm buildings and facilities

Programme Activities

The main methods for achieving the programme objectives will be:

Training courses, workshops, demonstrations and conferences, etc;

  • Deliver short courses in machinery, e.g. sprayers, fertiliser spreaders and hedge cutters
  • Provide courses for contractors using the Contractor Cost control Planner
  • Contractors conference/event/courses
  • Launch updated milking machine recommendations booklet with Irish Milk Quality Cooperative Society (IMQCS) and make a presentation at annual IMQCS refresher seminar
  • Conduct an IMQCS training course
  • In-service training for teachers and advisers
  • Press articles, technical notes and drawings;continue to develop the machinery/buildings section on Teagasc websites
  • Liase with:DAF, PAC Ireland, IMQCS, IrishFarm Buildings Association (IFBA), WIT, UCD.

Programme impact and evaluation

Number of conferences/seminars and short courses for machinery contractors and other industry groups

Attendance at conferences/seminars and short courses for contractors

Number of contractors using the Contractor Cost Control Planner

Number and variety of drawings and fact sheets published

Create an awareness of machinery costs on dairy farms among advisers, teachers and farmers

Labour Organisation Programme 2004

Industry Analysis

The labour input available to the agricultural sector is declining by 3.4% per annum . The Agri Food 2010 Report ( DAF) indicates that the number of full time farmers will decline to 20% while the number of part time farmers will increase to 60% of the total farming population by 2010. The remaining 20% will be composed of transitional farmers. Thus, efficient use of farm labour will be a crucial component of the viability of the majority of farms going forward.

Research conducted by Teagasc in the dairying, cattle, sheep and tillage enterprises indicates that considerable improvements in labour efficiency can be gained on the majority of farms. The research, generally, indicates that efficient use of labour and incomes from farming go hand-in-hand. Efficient use of farm labour, also, is positively associated with Quality of Life issues such as having time for leisure, stress management and ‘positivity’ towards the future.

A study of the views of Teagasc Advisers and Participants in the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme (Bogue, 2003) indicated that the majority of Advisers (73 %) and Participants (50%) believed that Quality of Life could be improved, principally, through enhanced work organisation.

Objective

  • To promote awareness and uptake of practices and technology for effective farm labour use.

In-service Training

  • Disseminate information from Teagasc research on Labour Use to advisers nationally at inservice training events
  • Publish findings of study of the relationship between profitability and labour hours worked from data available from the Moorepark and Grange Labour Studies.
  • Profile labour organisation issues in the national media and at Teagasc events.
  • Produce an Adult Training Module book on Labour Use.
  • Provide in-service training to education officers /teachers on training methods for labour use.
  • Produce a video/DvD training material on Labour Use.
  • Provide training on labour organisation to all trainees completing the CIF Management Module
  • and those completing 100-hour Adult training courses.

Impact Measurement

  • Monitor trends in farm labour use from CSO and NFS data.
  • Record activities and events conducted as part of the Teagasc Labour Organisation programme

Animal Nutrition Programme

Industry Trends

Grazed grass remains our cheapest feed but the strategic use of alternative forages, feeds and concentrates will be necessary in the future. Concentrate usage on many dairy farms should decrease with a greater emphasis on the maximisation of grazed grass in the diet. The economics of concentrate feeding on dairy farms is dependent on milk price (which is declining) and concentrate price. Many beef farmers may see concentrate feed costs increasing due to extra feeding for earlier marketing of animals. Feed ingredient prices in 2004 are expected to remain high as a result of the drought on continental Europe in 2003.

Implications for Teagasc

Teagasc has a strong technical capacity and are capable of providing an independent, science based nutritional service. Future Teagasc clients will need to be highly efficient and feed costs represent a large proportion of the costs of production for milk & meat. We can add value to our service by providing specialised technical support in this area. Teagasc has a role to play in developing cost effective feeding programmes that are sustainable for the future

Objectives

The primary objective of the Teagasc Animal Nutrition Programme for 2004 is to improve the efficiency of livestock enterprises through improved knowledge, skills and practices in the nutrition and feeding of livestock. This may be achieved through:

  • Farmer awareness
  • Nutrition specialisation amongst advisers at county level
  • Decision support at farm level
Animal nutrition activities for 2004
Programme activitives Targets 2003

Information & awareness

The Teagasc nutrition advisory service will be strongly promoted at national level through all the farming media and general media including

Radio

Newspapers

Todays Farm

Client site: Development of client site

Monitoring the use of on-line Ration Reckner

Publications: Newsletters / technical digests

Press articles

Development of service brochure

Seminars: Regional & local seminars

Discussion group meetings

Conferences

Farm walks

1-2

5-10

2-3

2-3

2-3

1

5-10

5-10

3-4

4-6

   

Training courses

In-service training: Teagasc advisers

Adviser specialist training in nutrition

2 / years

2 per county

   

Monitoring and Evaluation of the programme

The programme will be carried out by one Specialist with the assistance of livestock enterprise specialists and advisors. Programme effectiveness will be monitored and evaluated using the following indicators

Information / Awareness objective
  • Animal nutrition newsletters, seminars, national media (radio, newspapers), Today’s Farm, client site hits, technical digests, press articles, publication of service brochure, regional & local seminars, discussion group and conferences
  • The percentage of clients using the Teagasc Nutrition Services and the online Ration Reckner.
  • The preparation of a booklet on ad lib feeding systems for finishing beef units.
Training Objective
  • Number of Teagasc advisers completing specialised nutrition courses
  • Number of Teagasc advisers completing general nutrition in-service training
Decision Support Objective
  • The role of mechanised feeding systems on Irish farms in the future will be investigated. A booklet will be prepared on this subject. This will form the basis for helping farmers make a decision on the role of mechanised feeding systems on their farm

Service Delivery and Marketing

  • The Teagasc Nutrition programme will be delivered mainly through the Technology & Business Service. While the Teagasc Nutrition Programme is independent of the livestock enterprise groups, the programme will feed into the joint Teagasc / industry programmes under the heading of Information and Awareness above
  • The livestock enterprise specialists will provide leadership and direction in the implementation of the Teagasc Nutrition Programme.

Farm Financial Management Programme

Industry Trends

Farming is facing uncertain times ahead arising from the Fischler reform of the CAP. The economics of some systems of farming and some enterprises will be affected. Farmers need comprehensive financial supports and skills in order to maintain income levels.

Teagasc has, in recent years through the Technology and Business Service developed its reputation and competency in the area of financial management and farm planning. The development of user friendly computer software and the financial training modules have been timely. The up-skilling of advisers through training at enterprise level and through the Diploma in Farm Financial Management has provided a platform for improved client services.

Programme Objectives and Targets

There are two main objectives in the programme:

  • Ensuring that the “Planning Post Fischler Programme” is supported and implemented throughout the Advisory Service.
  • Ensuring that farm financial management is integrated into the dairying, drystock, tillage and horticulture advisers work programmes and the education curriculum.
  • These will be achieved by working with Specialists and Advisers to provide notes, worksheets and computer programmes to enable staff to carry out quick effective farm financial analysis and forward budgets

Programme Activities

  • Support the use by Specialists and Advisers of the FINPACK and other computer analysis packages to examine options on commercial farms in the Post Fischler era. Simplified Options Analysis Worksheets will be promoted to examine options on the smaller and part-time farms. In-service training and ongoing support will be provided for advisory staff.
  • Provide day-to-day backup to financial related questions and issues from Advisers. Helping Advisers in drawing up farm financial plans for clients.
  • The provision of and maintenance of notes, worksheets and computer programmes to support farm financial analysis work is a key part of the ‘Planning Post Fischler Programme’. These include the Farm Accounts Worksheets, Dairy Herd Monitor, e-Profit Monitor, Cost Control Planner, Farm Investment Appraisal Programme and Farm Planning Programme. There will be a major emphasis on increased usage of the new e-Profit Monitor programme on Dairy, Drystock and Tillage farms.
  • This material is delivered through in-service training backed up by the Teagasc T-net and Client Web sites. Targets for the use of the various financial analysis tools through individual consultations and short financial courses are set out in each of the commodity work programmes.
  • The major direct payments, grants and schemes are worth over €1.7 billion annually to the agricultural sector and require regular in-service training to update specialist advisers, county advisers, county education officers and college teachers.

Staff are also updated regularly on all aspects of farm taxation and its impact on the various farm enterprises and new investment plans.

A key method of delivery is through the widely used Teagasc Management Data for Farm Planning Book which is revised and updated each year.

  • Specialist training and support is also provided for Succession and Retirement planning on farms, the depopulated herds programme and new advisers.
  • Other areas of work include liaison with other relevant sectors and bodies, for example Teagasc Rural Economy Division, Teagasc National Farm Survey, F.A.P.R.I., Central Statistics Office, Department of Agriculture and Food, Farm Management Software Companies and the Financial Institutions. Short summary notes are produced and circulated when required.
  • Information is also disseminated through publication such as Teagasc Today’s Farm, local newspapers, Irish Farmers Journal and the Farming Independent and the production of papers for conferences and display boards for shows and demonstrations.
  • Contributions are also made to numerous adult education courses and agricultural college courses.

Monitoring and Evaluation

This programme will be monitored in the delivery of the main commodity programmes.

Forestry Programme

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

The programme is a joint programme with Forest Service staff. Forest Service staff will provide some technical forestry and administrative input to the programme. Annual new planting by the private sector since 1995 has varied between 10,000 and 17,000 hectares per year, with the level for 2003 at 12,000 hectares. Farmers now carry out over 80% of all afforestation. Currently over 13,000 farmers have a farm forest enterprise and about 10% of the total area of the country is under forests.

It is vital that this appreciating resource is managed sustainably to best forest management practices to ensure quality timber production and an optimum return to the farmer, the government and the EU. This return can be further enhanced as forestry plays an increasing role in enabling Ireland to meet its Kyoto Protocol targets.

Timber is a world traded commodity. There are no quotas or restrictions on production levels or volumes traded. World timber prices are cyclical and the situation with regard to the price of Irish timber is no different. Currently approximately 95% of all timber sales are from Coillte forests. This is set to change dramatically over the next 10 years as timber from private forests comes on stream. By the year 2015, approximately 25% of all timber production will be from private forests.

Industry Challanges

A significant group of the above private planters, 5000 landowners with 50,000 hectares, have forests at or near the first thinning stage. The issue of planning and marketing the first thinnings coming from those forests is now beginning to be addressed. Promoting a timber culture among farmers will also facilitate this.

Timber quality and issues related to sustainable forest management will determine future competitiveness. There is a growing requirement that timber is certified as coming from a sustainably managed forest and this will help to improve the marketing of timber. Timber growers must demonstrate that they have managed their plantations in accordance with sustainable forest management practices from establishment to felling. Private growers need a system to record practices from the outset of planting so that when a timber certification system is in place suitable records will be available.

Programme Resources

The Teagasc Forestry Programme 2000-2006 is delivered by 9 full-time Forestry Advisers and 1 part-time Land Use Adviser per County, (5 full time work year equivalents). These are the staff necessary to deliver the Teagasc statutory forestry advisory and training role, which is an integral part of the Teagasc Rural Viability Service. The Programme is supported by 1 administrative staff person in Athenry. (One contract forestry staff member resigned during December ’03 and a replacement is being requested).

Programme Objectives

  • The inclusion of the forestry option in the process of optimising all direct payments to individual farmers, where appropriate. This is of particular importance in the lead-up to 2005 and will be an integral part of the planning post-Fischler programme.
  • The promotion of profitable quality timber production using sustainable forest management practices.

The key issues are promoting:

  • Forest establishment to highest possible standards with due regard for protection of the environment.
  • The development and maintenance of a system of record keeping that will meet future requirements for timber certification.
  • Good forest management in the vital early years in order to meet Forest Service standards at year 4.
  • Continued good management practice as plantations approach the first thinning or tending stage.
  • Strategic and co-operative approaches to thinning and associated operations.
  • The promotion of the importance of trees and hedgerows on the farm, especially in the context of the new REPS III Scheme.

The implementation of the objectives will be based on:

  • the provision of an independent forestry advisory and training service,
  • the continuation of the mainstreaming of the forestry programme thorough the whole of Teagasc’s advisory services;
  • the setting up of monitor farm forests commencing with forests at, or near, the first thinning stage for conifers and at or near tending stage for broadleaves;
  • the facilitation of the certification of timber, especially early thinnings from private forests, to improve marketing;
  • making landowners considering forestry aware of the work involved in establishing a farm forest enterprise and therefore capable of making an informed decision on the various options presented to them;
  • ensuring that landowners know what a properly established site looks like and what maintenance will be required in the early years thereby contributing to promoting best forest management practices leading to quality timber production;
  • providing training suitable for farmers on all aspects of farm forestry, including sustainable forest management and the requirement for international certification;
  • providing individual on-site tuition and technical advice and written prescriptions to farmers who already have land planted;
  • improving the quality of farm forest management in order to increase the proportion of farmers who receive second phase forestry grants when they are due for payment;
  • the provision of an early warning system in detecting problems in forests and identifying corrective actions promptly.

Programme Activities

Advisory Activities
  • Preparing the forestry input to Teagasc County Business Plans.
  • Farm visits.
  • Provision of a written, independent report with recommendations following visits.
  • Office consultations and phone consultations.
  • Provision of forestry clinics.
  • The setting up of monitor farm forests related to the first thinning of conifers and tending of broadleaves.
  • Forestry field days, farm walks on:
    • Afforestation
    • Forest Management
    • Preparing for thinning
    • The thinning operation
  • Information meetings for new entrants to forestry in the light of Fischler
  • Regional forestry seminars
  • National thinning events
  • Presentations at national and local conferences.
  • Press articles, forestry supplements to national newspapers and Today’s Farm.
  • Preparing of technical papers/factsheets/fliers
  • Local and national radio presentations.
  • Quarterly newsletters.
  • County promotional activities – shows.
  • Providing a forestry input to County Development Strategy implementation.
  • Providing a certification system (TF1 Form) related to qualifying for the ‘farmer’ rate of forest premium.
  • Participation in local/county projects relating to forestry.
  • Presentations to outside organisations.
  • Developing a suitable system of record keeping for forest owners re-certification requirements.
Training Activities
  • Introduction to forestry courses in each county for farmers establishing new plantations.
  • Special forestry training courses, including the management of young and older forests and skills courses.
  • The delivery of the forestry module in REPS, in the planning post-Fischler programme, in CIF and in other Teagasc training courses.
Other Activities
  • Having forestry incorporated into the National Farm Management Survey.
  • Preparing reports on the forestry programme and on issues relating to forestry for the Forest Service

Monitoring & Evaluation of the Programme

Performance Indicators

The advisory activities delivered will be monitored using the client management system for advisory visits and all other group and media related activities.

Training activities will be monitored using the web based adult training database. All courses offered and all applicants must be entered in the database.

  • Number of activities delivered by County and by staff member.
  • Numbers attending events.
  • Specific attention will be given to monitoring the number of activities related to preparing for first thinning and to gearing up for timber certification.
Effectiveness Indicators
  • The effectiveness of activities can be measured by independent survey. There is an urgent need to have proper baseline data so that impact can be measured and quantified.
  • The effectiveness of the forestry programme can be assessed using information from an increasing number of farmers with a farm forest enterprise participating in the National Farm Management Survey over the coming years.
  • Review of studies related to forestry, including COFORD studies commissioned by the Forest Service.
  • Percentage/proportion of plantations passing the first and second instalment inspections

Programme Targets

Advisory Activities
  • Farm visits 110
  • Office consultations 20
  • Phone consultations 400
  • Forestry Field Days 7
  • Forestry Seminars 1
  • Press articles, forestry supplements to
  • local newspapers and Today’s Farm 12
  • Local and national radio presentations 6
  • Quarterly newsletters 2
  • The setting up of monitor farm forests related to the first thinning of conifers and tending of broadleaves 3

Training Activities

  • Forestry courses on the management of existing
  • forests including skills courses 5
  • Introduction to forestry courses 3
  • The delivery of the forestry module in REPS courses 12
  • The delivery of the forestry module in planning post-
  • Fischler and other Teagasc courses 6

General Forestry Activities

  • Ongoing backup to Teagasc advisory staff on forestry issues
  • Co-operating with other Agencies on forestry developmental issues
  • Maintenance of forestry section of Teagasc Public Internet site
  • Maintenance of forestry section on internal Teagasc Intranet site
  • Maintenance of forestry section on Teagasc Client Net Site
  • Preparation of fact-sheets on forestry issues
  • Providing forestry input into major cattle, sheep and dairy events
  • Responding to requests for advice and information from Teagasc staff generally, e.g., via the REPS and planning post-Fischler programmes
  • In-service training for Forestry Advisers
  • Providing a forestry input to County Development Strategy implementation
  • Presentations at national and local conferences
  • Preparing input into Teagasc County Business Plans

Land Use Advisers and Other Teagasc Staff

  • TF1 Form completion.
  • Advice on land use change to forestry and the interaction between forestry and other EU schemes at farm level especially in the context of planning post-Fischler.
  • Organising forestry events, including assisting with Monitor Farm Forest project.
  • Organising publicity and attendance related to forestry courses.
  • Providing input to forestry courses on income optimisation as a result of a land use change to forestry, especially in the context of Fischler entitlements, REPS, Farm Retirement and Area-based Compensatory Allowance Schemes.
  • Office consultations re forestry.
  • Forestry-related press articles.
  • Helping to mainstream forestry within Teagasc.

Diversification of Farm Enterprises

Deer

Industry Analysis

Structure of Industry

There are approximately 300 deer farms in the country, with an average herd size of 60 breeding deer. The majority of deer farmers have off-farm employment with some farming deer in conjunction with other enterprises.

Last year 650 tonnes of venison was produced. Sixty percent was processed in Northern Ireland in Finnebrogue Venison, Downpatrick. This company is supplying Marks & Spencer (UK), Tesco (UK and Ireland) and SuperQuinn.

B & F Meats, Kilkenny exported approximately 100 tonnes of fallow venison to Denmark and provided venison to Wild Irish Game, Wicklow Supplies SuperQuinn, Pallas Foods as well as exporting to Europe. Finn Meats, Mitchelstown, started processing venison in September 2003 and are exporting to the UK and France. White’s Venison, Mayo exports venison to Germany.

On a per farm basis 655 producers farm red deer and their crosses, 33% fallow deer and 2% sika deer.

Future Outlook

The number of farmers having a deer enterprise reduced from 450 in the mid-nineties, but the size of the individual herds has increased. Sustained profitability is helping to stabilise the number of deer producers. An increased number of processors involved in venison also helps. However, because the biggest processor is based in Downpatrick it makes transporting small lots of finished animals very expensive. Consequently, a change to weaner production as opposed to finishing is occurring, especially in the southern half of the country. This trend is likely to continue.

At present the selling of weaners is ‘farmer to farmer’ direct either by word of mouth or by advertising in the farming press. There is need to have a more formal method for selling weaners in the future.

The Venison Industry Board is the main deer farmer representative body. It also helps in the co-ordination of the marketing of venison.

There are a number of deer farmers involved in Organic REPS deer farming and this is continuing to grow despite the fact that there is no price differential for organic venison.

The development of a Quality Assured Venison scheme by IFQC, Dundalk has improved the marketing potential of Irish Venison especially in supermarkets and it is expected that this trend will continue. There are approximately 100 deer farms now Quality Assured.

Industry Competitors

Competition for deer farming output comes from wild-shot venison in both the home and exports markets. The Food Safety Authority in 2001 imposed strict regulations on hotels and restaurants on where they source their venison. This has increased demand to farmed venison in the home market.

Wild-shot venison from Scotland and farmed venison from New Zealand are the main competition for Irish farmed venison in Europe.

Irish venison exporters continue to consolidate their market share especially in supermarkets. This should help to maintain venison prices to farmers.

Teagasc Competitors

There is no external competition for advisory or training services to deer farmers. Teagasc’s independent farm focused advice is very much appreciated and depended upon by producers.

Programme Objectives

The deer farming advisory programme will be an element of Teagasc’s Rural Viability and Diversification programme and will be available to participants in the Planning Post Fischler Programme.

The object of the programme is to sustain and improve the profitability and viability of existing deer farmers and to promote expansion to both existing and potential new entrants in response to market demand. This will be achieved by concentrating on:

  • Increasing output value by having better finished stock and by finishing stock at the time of the year in which they will command the best returns to the farmer and the marketing sector.
  • Promoting Quality Assured Venison production
  • Reducing production costs by improving grassland and other feed management.
  • Improving productivity
  • Breed improvement
  • Maximising schemes
  • Encouraging specialisation

Programme Activities

The main advisory methods for achieving the programme objectives will be:

  • Discussion Groups
  • The deer discussion groups need to be continuously revitalised, as the discussion group format is the main extension method used.
  • Monitor farms
  • New monitor farms will be put in place, as the existing ones have to be replaced due to changed circumstances.
  • Development plans and Deer Cost Control Planner1-3 will be continued on 10 farms.
  • Press articles, newsletters, Todays Farm, and the Teagasc web site
  • Information seminars
  • Advise and assist applicants for the Alternative Enterprise scheme
  • Liase with Government Departments and organisations that have an involvement with deer farming

The deer production specialist will service the programme with assistance of rural viability advisors.

The Alternative Enterprise and REP schemes will be administered at county level with back up specialist support.

Training Courses

Training courses on compliance for Quality Assurance status will be made available.

Training courses will be made available as per demand for the Alternative Enterprise scheme.

Programme Impact and Evaluation

Output improvement will be monitored at processing level in consultation with the Venison Industry Board. Costs and productivity changes will be monitored at discussion group level and at monitor farm level. The level of involvement in schemes and courses will be documented.

Measuring the impact of the programme will be integrated with the evaluation of the Rural Viability and Diversification Programme.

Organic Farming

Industry Analysis

29850 ha are farmed organically by 923 producers. The market for organically produced farm produce is increasing with a premium price being paid for it. The current premiums (above the price for conventionally produced produce) for organic produce are approximately 25% for milk, 20% for cattle and sheep, 60% for cereals and 40% to 60% for vegetables. The variable costs of farm production are 60 to 70% lower but fixed costs of organic farm production are about 45% higher than those for conventional farming.

The additional payment of €91/ha to organic producers participating in REPS adds to the financial viability of organic production.

The introduction of full decoupling in the mid term review gives an added advantage to organic production. This is especially true on cattle/sheep farms where the standards of husbandry are high. The only changes required are a slight reduction in stocking rate and a modification of the wintering facilities. Animal performance could be maintained and premium prices availed of.

Structure of the Industry

There are 747 farmers with full organic symbol status. This includes some 23 milk producers. Expansion of milk production at farm level is constrained as there is only one processor. As a result of this organic milk production is likely to remain a niche market. Beef and lamb are the main meat production areas with a potential for market growth. There are a number of processing outlets.

Future Outlook and Potential for Development

If the shortfall in milk processing can be overcome, there is a potential market for about 6.3m gallons of organically produced liquid milk. This could be met by 160 farmers each producing an average of 40,000 gallons.

The likely market for beef and lamb would require about 1,000 cattle and 2,000 lambs slaughtered per week. It is reasonable to propose that this could be met by about 2,500 farmers.

To meet the growing market for organic cereal, fruit and vegetable production an increase of 500 hectares in organic production, by 2005, is a realistic target. This level of increase will, however, only meet less than 25% of what the market requires.

Teagasc Organic Farming Programme

The organic farming advisory programme for 2003 will be an integral part of the Rural Viability and Diversification programme and will include:

  • Promotion and advisory activities.
  • Development of a demonstration farm network.
  • Training courses for adult farmers (in conversion or with full symbol status).
Promotion and Advisory Activities

The programme objective is to encourage and stimulate more farmers to convert to organic farming and to advise the farmers with full symbol status on best production methods.

Using the Teagasc facility at Mellows College and at Johnstown Castle to demonstrate best practice and efficient production. The programme activities to achieve this will include:

  • Development of 8 organic demonstration farms.
  • Development of a web site featuring information on organic farming.
  • Liaison with the Organic Farming Organisations on their needs and the needs of their members
  • Preparation of brochures on the main organic production systems
  • Presenting Organic Farming programmes on Local Radio and writing features for the local Press
  • Responding to telephone queries on all aspects of Organic Farming
  • Promotion of Teagasc’s Organic Farming training courses
  • Assisting farmers in the preparation of Business Plans
  • Making inputs on organic farming to REPS courses and to Teagasc's Opportunities for Farm Families Programme
  • Farm visits to plan and promote efficient production

The staff involvedwill include 3 dedicated organic advisers/teachers and other nominated county advisory staff.

Training Courses

The programme objectives are:

  • To give farmers the knowledge to decide whether or not to convert to organic farming
  • To improve the skills of organic farmers with full symbol status
  • Training courses to be delivered, at six local centres and at Mellows College, will be selected from a menu of six 20-hour training modules.

Programme Measurement and Evaluation

The following indicators will be used to measure the impact of the programme.

  • Number of farmers attending organic events organised by Teagasc/DAAF
  • Number of registered organic farmers
  • Number of farmers attending organic farming training courses
  • Number of Teagasc organic features published annually in farmer magazines

Measuring the impact of the programme will be integrated with the evaluation of the Rural Viability and Planning Post Fischler Programme.

Sport Horses

Industry Analysis

The sport horse industry comprises of three elements i.e. breeding, leisure and competition. The breeding element accounts for 64% of this, the leisure element 20% with the remaining 16% coming from the competition element. It is estimated that the sport horse industry is worth €500m annually to the national economy and supports a workforce of 12000 people.

Structure of the Breeding Sector

This comprises about 5,000 breeders, each with an average of 2.5 breeding mares and a total of 9 horses. Only about 75% of the sport horses are registered (i.e. have a passport) with a recognised breed society. All horses will have to be registered and have a passport by the end of 2004 due to new EU regulations. Of the registered mares at present only about one quarter are classified as quality mares.

Over the past five years the use of foreign bred stallions has increased from 8% covering the national herd to 24% in 2002, resulting in increased demand for information on foreign sires.

Surveys undertaken by Teagasc show that the percentage of breeders that have undertaken formal sport horse training courses has increased from 19% in 1995 to 40% in 2002.

Teagasc Sport Horse Programme

The Teagasc sport horse programme is an element of the Teagasc's Rural Viability and Diversification programme. In relation to sport horses the programme will be directed at improving the skills of the established breeders which will enable them to produce horses which are in highest market demand and to add value to young unbroken horses (i.e. those up to 3 years old). The skills training course will be available to sport horse producers who are referred from the Planning Post Fischler.

Promotion and Advisory Activities

The programme objective is to make breeders and producers aware of the best breeding and management skills/practices to produce horses with the conformation, movement, temperament and athletic ability to meet market demands

The programme activities designed to achieve this include:

  • Dissemination of information and best management practices through:
    • newsletters
    • demonstrations
    • sport horse events
    • seminars
    • local press and local radio
    • updating the TNET to include basic technical information on horse production including information on schemes.
    • updating brochures on horse production.

• Provide one-to-one management advice to breeders and producers.

• Advise and assist applicants for the Alternative Enterprise Scheme.

The staff involved in programme delivery will include:

• 3 Sport Horse Specialist Advisers and

• Nominated county advisory staff.

Training Courses

The programme objectives are:

  • To improve the skills of breeders and producers in
    • The management and husbandry of breeding mares and young horses to the 3-year old stage.
    • The presentation of horses for sale and for incentive schemes.
    • The registration of all horse

The programme activities to achieve this include:

  • Arranging and providing twelve 20 hour courses on breeding and management in Galway, Mayo, Clare, Laois, South Tipperary, Kilkenny, Donegal, Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Meath and Cavan.
  • Arranging and providing four 10 hour courses on In Hand Showing, Loose Schooling and Lunging in Roscommon Clare Cork and Kilkenny.
  • Continuation of judges training courses
  • Seminars meetings and demonstrations will be held during the year to promote the programme objectives
  • At least three National Exhibits promoting the programme will be held during 2004.
  • In-service training for all equine advisers on 20th and 23rd January 2004.

The staff involved in delivering this programmewill include the Sport Horse Specialist Advisers, county advisory staff responsible for adult training or nominated county advisers.

Programme Measurement and Evaluation

The following indicators will be used to measure the delivery of the programme.

  • The number of Teagasc sport horse features published annually in farmer magazines and presentations on local radio.
  • The number of farmers attending sport horse events.
  • The number of farmers receiving technical advice from the Sport Horse Specialist Advisers.
  • The number of applicants for the Alternative Enterprise Scheme (Sport Horses).
  • The number of farmers attending sport horse training courses.

Measuring the impact of the programme will be integrated with the evaluation of the Rural Viability and Opportunities Programmes.

Dairy Goat Farming

Industry Analysis

There are approximately 200 farmers with a dairy goat enterprise in Ireland with herd sizes ranging from 10 to 550.

Dairy goat farming is a growth area with an increasing demand for goat’s milk for yoghurt, ice-cream, cheese and liquid milk consumption. Existing cheese makers using cows’ milk are looking for goats’ milk as the market is shifting from cows’ cheese to goats’ cheese.

An increasing number of medical practitioners are prescribing goats’ milk for children suffering from asthma, eczema and for children unable to digest the fat in cows’ milk. An increasing number of people within the ethnic population have an intolerance to the lactose in cows’ milk and are consequently consuming goats’ milk. The goat industry is a market led industry.

Constraints

  • The biggest constraint to the rapid expansion of the industry is the scarcity of suitable goats. Fresh milk is not available all the year round and as a result, we have to import goats’ milk for at least four months each year, which is dated, and not the most ideal for processing.
  • The sourcing of healthy breeding stock of high genetic merit.
  • The relatively low level of solids in the imported goats’ milk and its lack of freshness.
  • The low level of grant aid available through the Scheme of Investment Aid in Alternative Enterprises for Goat Farming.
  • The lack of Research and Development funding.
  • The urgent necessity for In-Service Training for advisers.

Teagasc Goat Producers Programme

The Teagasc Goat Producers programme will integrate with the rural viability and diversification programme. The programme objective is to provide practical training courses for people who want to increase their income through goat milk production and to provide information on practical production to the more commercially minded goat producers:-

To service the existing two dairy goat discussion groups i.e. Midlands and West Cork.

To increase average milk yields to 800 litres.

To produce a uniform level of fresh milk all the year round.

To improve the health status and genetic potential of existing goat herds.

That more goat farmers will adopt an effective identification system (ear tags, neck collars, leg bands, ear tattooing or micro-chip).

Programme Activities for 2004

  • Phone calls and individual consultations.
  • Farm visits
  • Farm walks
  • Business plans
  • 6 Newsletters
  • Press Articles
  • Servicing the two dairy goat discussion groups.
  • 4 articles for Irish Goat News magazine.
  • 25 Hour Dairy Goat Course if demand arises.

Programme Measurement and Evaluation

The following indicators will be issued:

  • Number of telephone contacts with goat producers throughout the country.
  • Number of farm visits and consultations.
  • Number of farmers attending farm walks.
  • Number of farmers attending training course.
  • Reduction in quantity of imported goats’ milk.

Poultry

Industry Analysis

Poultry production is worth €250m at farm gate. The industry can be broadly divided into poultry meat and eggs, with a further breakdown into breeding, hatcheries, pullet rearing and processing of intensive and free-range units.

The indigenous poultry meat industry continues to face serious challenges on a number of fronts. The main problems are growth of cheap imports, over-capacity, lack of efficiencies of scale and low profitability. Lack of scale is a key industry weakness. Rationalisation of processing is necessary. Poultry must be approached from a consumer perspective by increasing the value added product range. Quality and assurance schemes will play a major role in differentiation of products.

Programme Objectives

The objectives of the poultry programme are to:

  • Provide education & practical training skills for people who want to increase farm income through the establishment of a poultry enterprise
  • Conduct training programme on best flock management practices
  • Provide technical support and training on the production of quality assured poultry products
  • Promote the income earning potential of poultry to clients participating in the Opportunities for farm Families Programme
  • Provide back-up information to advisers from all disciplines, who wish to advise clients on poultry as a supplementary enterprise.
  • Provide a poultry information service

Activities

The programme activities will include:

  • Delivery of training courses of 25 hour duration, for enterprise establishment at various centres
  • Provision of training for producers
  • Provision of training for quality assured production
  • Presentations to advisers on poultry opportunities
  • Individual consultations
  • Press articles and newsletters
  • Provision of information through telephone, email & post.

Programme Measurement and Evaluation

The following indicators will be used to measure the impact of the programme:

  • Quality of the training provided
  • Number of training courses offered
  • Progress of development of quality assurance programme
  • Number of Information packs distributed
  • Inputs to Opportunities for Farm Families Programme

Rural Tourism

Industry Analysis

Irish tourism industry is worth €3.8 billion. Rural tourism is estimated to be worth 30% of total revenue generated.

Structure of Rural Tourism Sector

The rural tourism sector breaks down into accommodation and attraction suppliers. In all there are approximately 25,000 suppliers of which 10,000 are also involved in farming. As opposed to the hotel sector rural tourism is fragmented and lacks a common voice to address the numerous issues of concern to the sector, issues such as a policy at national level, marketing, innovative ideas for development, and training. Training is not a requirement for participation in the industry. Rural tourism training is supplied in local communities by a partnership between Teagasc/Failte Ireland/IT's. LEADER also provides funding for training. Marketing of the sector is done by a number of supplier associations such as Irish Farmhouse Association, Town & Country Homes and Irish Country Holidays supported by Regional Tourism Authorities (RTA) and Failte Ireland. The sector seriously needs support both from a training and marketing viewpoint.

Teagasc Rural Tourism Programme

The Teagasc rural tourism Programme will constitute an element of the Rural Viability and Diversification Programme and will be integrated into the Planning Post Fischler Programme.

The programme objective is to:

  • Promote the income earning potential of rural tourism to clients participating in the Planning Post Fischler Programme and guide interested participants in product establishment and marketing through training and facilitation and case study analysis.
  • Encourage co-operation among the various organisations supplying the rural tourism product such as walking, cycling, angling, health holidays, open farms, castles and gardens, rural restaurants and accommodation.

The programme activities to achieve the above objectives will include:

  • Setting up a National Federation on Rural Tourism with similar objectives to the National Hotel Federation which will create a common voice for the rural tourism sector involving 30 national organisations.
  • Facilitation sessions under the Planning Post Fischler Programme presenting the income potential of rural tourism and assisting farm families in establishing and improving product.
  • Provision of training in rural tourism (i.e. modules approved by Curriculum Development Unit and CERT).
  • The training modules will be provided for referrals from the Opportunities Programme and will be aimed at improving the quality of the bed and breakfast product.
  • Partnership courses will be delivered with LEADER companies leading to a Certificate in Irish Home Hospitality (FETAC).
  • Working in partnership with other agencies and organisation involved in rural tourism (LEADER, CEB, farm organisations) in implementing partnership programmes for rural tourism development.
  • Providing technical advice and consultancy on rural tourism to LEADER groups, County Development Boards, CEB, Farm Organisations, Rural Tourism Groups, ICH Marketing Group, Department of Rural Community and Gaeltacht Affairs.
    • Disseminating of information through:
    • Newsletters
    • Press Articles
    • Seminars
    • Intranet through updated information on tourism products
  • Encouraging individuals and groups involved in rural tourism to enter AIB/Teagasc/IFJ competitions and participate on adjudication panels.
  • Participation on Governing Body and Development Sub-Committee GMIT.
  • The staff involved in programme delivery will include:
  • All County Planning Post Fischler Programme staff
  • Monitoring the progress of the programme will be based on:
  • Number of clients requiring training and advise on rural tourism from the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme.
  • The establishment of a National Federation of Rural Tourism.
  • Number of facilitation sessions on rural tourism as a follow up to the Opportunities for Farm Families Programme.
  • Number of short training modules delivered.
  • Number of linkages set up with other agencies in providing partnership type programmes including training and seminars.
  • Number of meetings and joint sessions with other agencies and rural tourism associations; number of operators attending.
  • Number of meetings providing technical support and advice to other associations and agencies.
  • Number of leaflets produced and distributed.
  • Number of press articles, newsletters and media presentations.
New Page 1