Energy Use on Tillage Farms
Grain drying and cultivations are key to improving energy efficiency on tillage farms. From grain quality assurance standards to end user grower protocols, there is increasing pressure on tillage farmers to improve energy efficiency. While these may seem like regulatory hoops, there are considerable financial savings to be gained by being energy efficient. Energy efficiency has always been a harder sell than renewable technology, but the returns can be just as good, with many projects paying back in two to five years. The difficulty is that energy efficiency is harder to measure and requires accurate monitoring and recording.
Keeping a record of fuel use over time allows growers to identify where most fuel is used and see how consumption can be cut just by doing things more efficiently. Electricity use on most combinable crop farms is generally fairly minimal, so the greatest scope for saving energy (disregarding embedded energy in fertiliser) lies in the fuel needed during crop drying, storage and for field cultivations. Energy used in each operation varies widely depending on the business. Some 90% of energy use might be in the field, whereas if you are drying grain, it may be closer to a 50:50 split.
Cultivations and crop husbandry
Typical fuel costs for field cultivations on a 50ha tillage enterprise are €2,500 based on a fuel price of €0.60 per litre. Recording fuel and equipment use can provide accurate information on the relative fuel used by each operation and focus on energy used.
In terms of cultivations, the biggest step for cutting energy use is to switch to a minimum or no-tillage system to reduce the amount of soil moved. This will not suit every farm and there are some agronomic reasons for sticking with more fuel-intensive systems.
With all systems, there is an opportunity to reduce energy by reducing working depth and tillage intensity where conditions allow.
Key steps to consider
Combining machine operations
Using equipment that allows multiple jobs to be done with each pass, such as ploughing and pressing or cultivation and sowing, can cut energy use by 25-40%. It may require compromises in set-up and speed, but generally saves time and fuel.
Matching tractors and implements
Using smaller engine tractors where possible can save up to 50% of fuel, depending on the job. Also consider more efficient models when buying, or use a contractor instead of buying a bigger tractor.
Match gear and engine speed
Operate tractor engines at the lowest speed for the power requirement, but do not overload the engine. The use of economy PTO speeds (540E) can help achieve this. One European Efficient Energy 20 study found that reducing engine speed from 1,800-2,200rpm to 1,000-1,600rpm gave the following fuel savings:
- spring tine cultivating – 7%;
- disc harrowing – 12.5%;
- fertiliser spreading – 25.9%;
- ploughing – 6.4%;
- rolling – 16.9%;
- drilling – 15.8%; and,
- transport – 17.6%.
Key tasks include:
- field tyre pressure: reduce to minimum for load and speed being used;
- set all soil engaging tools carefully in terms of depth, level in both directions, line of draught (plough), and correct lift linkage settings;
- ensure all machines with clearance settings and cutting elements (whether mowers, balers, forage harvesters or soil-engaging parts) are set correctly, or sharpened where appropriate;
- ensure all servicing in terms of air filters, cooling systems and lubrication are attended to; and,
- sharpen blades on items like balers – 10% power losses have been found on balers with blunt blades.
Optimising tyre sizes and pressures
Reducing rolling resistance and avoiding wheel slip will save energy in the field. Rolling resistance is reduced by increasing the tyre size and reducing tyre pressure to minimise tyre sinkage. Wheel slip is reduced by careful ballasting and fitting large enough tyres to avoid sinkage. Ploughing trials showed that a reduction in tyre pressures from 1.6 bar to 1.0 bar saved 5% in fuel. However large, low-pressure tyres are less efficient on the road, as are tractors compared to trucks, so choose the machines you use extensively on the road carefully.
Cost of rented land
Always consider the time, fuel and machinery costs incurred on road transport when renting land and factor it into its value before deciding to farm it. A distant block of land could add up to €150/ha on machinery costs. Arrange cropping in blocks sized to minimise road travel.
Drying and storage
Crop drying and storage is the largest single item of direct fuel usage in cereal production. A high-temperature drier will consume 55 litres of fuel oil for each hectare of crop that is harvested/dried. To bring moisture from 20% to 15% typically takes about six litres of fuel (diesel) for each tonne of grain to be dried.
The improvements in management and equipment necessary to reduce the use of energy during drying and storage of crops, will lead to significant savings in cost and improved quality and value of the produce stored. Measures leading to reduction in energy may not always be cost effective because of the substantial capital investment required, but often they can be justified due to the additional benefit of improved produce quality and reduced weight loss. Simple measures such as ensuring all controls (especially humidity) are set correctly can cut energy use by a quarter:
- grain can be efficiently stored by using onfloor or bin drying systems, which use ambient air to remove the initial moisture and only then add heat to further extract moisture below 18% moisture content (MC);
- ensure equipment is well maintained, ventilation fans are the appropriate size and moisture measurements are accurate;
- adding recirculation to existing cross-flow driers can save up to 30% of energy usage;
- ensure the drier is operating at the right capacity and avoid a second pass through; and,
- increase harvesting capacity to allow grain to be harvested at lower moisture.
There have been big advances in graindrying technology over recent years and energy efficiency is a key driver. Modern dryers include features such as precise control of grain flow and temperature, insulated walls to retain heat, air recycling and efficient burner technology. Savings noted in Table 2 are based on cost of fuel for a 3% MC reduction.
Fact sheet produced by Barry Caslin, Rural Economy Development Programme and Dermot Forristal, Senior Research Officer, Teagasc.